MS850 said:marc said:
Love the brakes
+1
Beringer 4SP02 4 x Ø27 mm? Did you alter the lugs? I can't see an adapter plate in the pic. Which floating disc did you select?
Thanks,
Knut
MS850 said:marc said:
Love the brakes
mdt-son said:MS850 said:marc said:
Love the brakes
+1
Beringer 4SP02 4 x Ø27 mm? Did you alter the lugs? I can't see an adapter plate in the pic. Which floating disc did you select?
Thanks,
Knut
Man, that's a pile :mrgreen: To that end, if that is what you consider "not as nice", I wish I could see your previous bike!MGB65B said:Very similar to mine, but this time a USA import bike, with quite a bit of evidence of weather exposure that my Australian delivery bike never had. Not as nice as mine was, yet, but I'll get there in in time I guess.
Cycle Goon said:Man, that's a pile :mrgreen: To that end, if that is what you consider "not as nice", I wish I could see your previous bike!MGB65B said:Very similar to mine, but this time a USA import bike, with quite a bit of evidence of weather exposure that my Australian delivery bike never had. Not as nice as mine was, yet, but I'll get there in in time I guess.
MGB65B said:Cycle Goon said:Man, that's a pile :mrgreen: To that end, if that is what you consider "not as nice", I wish I could see your previous bike!MGB65B said:Very similar to mine, but this time a USA import bike, with quite a bit of evidence of weather exposure that my Australian delivery bike never had. Not as nice as mine was, yet, but I'll get there in in time I guess.
I guess I'm my own worst enemy in being obsessive; my original Commando was a pampered thing. For example I had the engine completely disassembled at 14,000 miles, crankcases "blued" for perfect alignment to minimise oil seepage. The bores were still perfect at this time, with the original hone marks still clearly visible. It was as close to oil tight as any Commando could be. When I was working interstate in a less secure region, I kept the bike in my spare bedroom; just a few loose sheets of newspaper underneath. The rest of the bike was close to as good too as the mechanicals.
The list of what's been done on this bike I've just bought, so far, suggests it was probably rather neglected in recent years. Many items have needed replacement that I'd have never needed to ever dream about on my "dry climate" machine. The fact that the seat is new (fibreglass base! The original must have rusted its base through), and a fibreglass right side frame cover (original lost, rusted, damaged?), new handlebars, the very fact that the engine cases were deemed to need "professional" polishing and so on all suggest a somewhat neglected weathered bike. But something that hopefully in time, and with not too many $$$ I can turn this bike into something closer still to what I had.
I've a long standing friend who's been in the classic bike trade all his working life, first as a seller of Triumph, Velocette and Norton when they were new, and now as a classic bike restorer and trader. He warned me just last night to not fall in to the trap of comparing the "new" bike to my old. But I'll certainly have something to work towards. Fork top nuts, instrument bezels and Mk3 Isolastics will be early on the list of things to attend to. Once I see how it actually looks and rides the list will presumably grow. Wheels pitted? Other corroded fixtures? Frame? etc etc. I'm sure we're all familiar with the story.
The bike should be delivered in a week or so from interstate, when I'll have a better idea of what lies ahead.
In case anyone's interested, here's a Youtube link to the selling dealer demonstrating the bike I've just bought.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQE4wdc ... e=youtu.be
grandpaul said:MGB, you have nothing to be ashamed of there. Very nice bike that just needs a bit of minor attention. Classic classic!
MS850 said:grandpaul said:MGB, you have nothing to be ashamed of there. Very nice bike that just needs a bit of minor attention. Classic classic!
I agree, I wished my bike looked that good when I got it.
MGB65B, I suppose you have one, When I was 15 a neighbor had one not running, I wanted it in the worst way. This was about 1968, It was definitely a "B" model but not sure of the year.
Growing up in SoCal you think Id want something like a '57 Chevy, my friends were getting Harleys and Hondas, I bought a Norton.
.MGB65B said:MS850 said:grandpaul said:MGB, you have nothing to be ashamed of there. Very nice bike that just needs a bit of minor attention. Classic classic!
I agree, I wished my bike looked that good when I got it.
MGB65B, I suppose you have one, When I was 15 a neighbor had one not running, I wanted it in the worst way. This was about 1968, It was definitely a "B" model but not sure of the year.
Growing up in SoCal you think Id want something like a '57 Chevy, my friends were getting Harleys and Hondas, I bought a Norton.
MS850, you're quite right; I have a 1965 model MGB (with "MGB-65B" number (license) plates). I bought it January 17 1970, so just under 47 years ago. It's had a huge amount of use; it's on its third time round the odometer! I personally have covered about 220,000 miles in the car!
I love the British cars and bikes from this period, so I also own a 1962 MGA 1600 MkII, the recently purchased Dominator 88SS, and shortly another 1974 850 Commando Roadster.
I tend to hang on to (and regularly use) my bikes and cars a long time, so I owned a 1967 BSA A65 Thunderbolt for 20 years, and the previous 850 Commando Roadster for 25 years.
have a 5 speed g/box in strengthened shell
Cheers!grandpaul said:Very nicely appointed Red Roadster, Johnny!