Fast Eddie
VIP MEMBER
Mines due back tomorrow.
Really excited to have it sitting in the shed for the next couple of weeks ….
Really excited to have it sitting in the shed for the next couple of weeks ….
Mines due back tomorrow.
Really excited to have it sitting in the shed for the next couple of weeks ….
View attachment 119978
Not good . Glad you found it.Check the things out when you get ‘em back boys.
My gear linkage lever was loose on the shaft.
And I don’t mean loose as in not quite tight enough… I mean loose as in it hadn’t even seen an Allen key… and would most likely have disassembled itself within a few miles…
One of the guys on the Facebook group is reporting his bike now jumps out of gear after the recall workCheck the things out when you get ‘em back boys.
My gear linkage lever was loose on the shaft.
And I don’t mean loose as in not quite tight enough… I mean loose as in it hadn’t even seen an Allen key… and would most likely have disassembled itself within a few miles…
Given the (total) lack of response to my recent emails to them I see little point in doing this. I believe they check the forums so can access the information easily… what they do / do not do with it is up to them.I assume this has been reported back to Norton. I would have thought they would still be liable for faults arising from any subcontracted work.........
Did they say which gear? Can't imagine they would need to touch any of the internal shift linkage or shift pawlOne of the guys on the Facebook group is reporting his bike now jumps out of gear after the recall work![]()
I thought the same, can’t see the link between working on the clutch and gearbox issues like he seems to have ?Did they say which gear? Can't imagine they would need to touch any of the internal shift linkage or shift pawl
Doesn't that sound like the effect caused by the loose countershaft sprocket nut?One of the guys on the Facebook group is reporting his bike now jumps out of gear after the recall work![]()
I thought the same, can’t see the link between working on the clutch and gear selection issues?
Bloke said this: “but unfortunately the bike is now jumping out of gear, which it didn't do before. It popped out of 4th or 5th while gently accelerating and then later jumped out of 1st by itself when coming to a stop”.
Still nothing as to what the actual problem was?Got mine back today. 6 day turnaround including the bank holiday so there doesn't seem to be much consistency with how long they're taking, I'm assuming its more related to transport availability. Anyway all seems OK, took it for a 25 mile run and everything seemed normal. Must have run out of wallets and keyrings though! but just happy to get it back tbh. No scratches or anything so I'm happy with that. When the guy collected it last Friday he told me they were about half way through and its definately only the first 575 bikes that are affected. So I'm assuming by now it must be another week, two at most and its all done.
That makes no sense in light of how the gearbox is set up, and if they fixed the clutch basket again, that wouldn't cause transmission issues. I think I would make sure someone is shifting into a positive gear first before saying the sky is falling.I thought the same, can’t see the link between working on the clutch and gear selection issues?
Bloke said this: “but unfortunately the bike is now jumping out of gear, which it didn't do before. It popped out of 4th or 5th while gently accelerating and then later jumped out of 1st by itself when coming to a stop”.
My thoughts also, I wonder if a gear linkage put on the wrong angle on the splines might put the pedal in a sufficiently different position to make the riders ‘muscle memory’ result in poor gear changes ?That makes no sense in light of how the gearbox is set up, and if they fixed the clutch basket again, that wouldn't cause transmission issues. I think I would make sure someone is shifting into a positive gear first before saying the sky is falling.
The lad who collected it was from Norton themselves as opposed to one of the contract transport companies. I had a chat to him and he basically said they had identified two or three bikes where one of the securing screws on the starter ring gear had been loose and they identified the problem to some thread locker that hadn't cured, but that after bike number 575 they had changed the assembly process (for other reasons). When checking back they realised that (whatever the detail of the assembly was) it could only be a problem up to bike 575. After that the change in process would have meant that the problem couldn't have happened anyway. So they made the decision to recall all 575 bikes and install new screws. Seems very much precautionary rather than a definite problem but certainly the right thing to do.Still nothing as to what the actual problem was?
The fact that this can even be tracked is likely a result of a big improvement in provess.The lad who collected it was from Norton themselves as opposed to one of the contract transport companies. I had a chat to him and he basically said they had identified two or three bikes where one of the securing screws on the starter ring gear had been loose and they identified the problem to some thread locker that hadn't cured, but that after bike number 575 they had changed the assembly process (for other reasons). When checking back they realised that (whatever the detail of the assembly was) it could only be a problem up to bike 575. After that the change in process would have meant that the problem couldn't have happened anyway. So they made the decision to recall all 575 bikes and install new screws. Seems very much precautionary rather than a definite problem but certainly the right thing to do.