- Joined
- May 12, 2011
- Messages
- 89
JB weld website says 600 degrees will soften it up.
It's totally the lack of air filtering that's bothering me. The stacks work great; the bike runs noticeably stronger. But it's quite dusty here and although I thought originally I would just accept that and refresh the engine as needed, I just can't get my head around intentionally causing engine wear.
You accomplished all that can be accomplished with the 300F excursion. You had the epoxy in the rubbery state and it still had too much strength to remove, which isn’t at all surprising as it would not require much strength on a thread of that size to keep you from rotating the threaded parts. Remember that the rubbery state encompasses materials that range in modulus from very soft and compliant medical elastomers to highly elastic and tough tubing, to tire rubber, to Bobcat treads. Think of your undertaking as vulcanizing a liquid rubber in the threaded joint, and how nearly impossible it might be to separate the joint after the fact. As you've noted, you obviously require a very low modulus rubber adhesive the next time around if you intend to separate the parts in the future.FWIW, 300F per the oven temperature setting had no effect on the JB Weld. So since I'm not willing to go to the 600F that JB Weld says is needed, I'll be trying the filters Craig suggested. OR, I guess I could just suck it up and deal with no filters as I originally planned.
Note too self: next time DON'T use JB Weld to attach velocity stacks!![]()
Blimey I've never learnt so much from a pair of glued on bell mouths!You accomplished all that can be accomplished with the 300F excursion. You had the epoxy in the rubbery state and it still had too much strength to remove, which isn’t at all surprising as it would not require much strength on a thread of that size to keep you from rotating the threaded parts. Remember that the rubbery state encompasses materials that range in modulus from very soft and compliant medical elastomers to highly elastic and tough tubing, to tire rubber, to Bobcat treads. Think of your undertaking as vulcanizing a liquid rubber in the threaded joint, and how nearly impossible it might be to separate the joint after the fact. As you've noted, you obviously require a very low modulus rubber adhesive the next time around if you intend to separate the parts in the future.
Because the epoxy is a x-linked polymer it will never melt or flow, so increasing the temperature above 200F would have only minimal effect on the rubbery modulus. The suggestion of going to 600F refers to the upper temperature excursion the epoxy can tolerate for 10 minutes (from the TDS link below) before it will degrade. At 600F continuous exposure the polymer will char, decompose and simply go away, as will almost all organic polymers (consider what organic materials spilled in your oven look like over time at high temperature and the grey dust remaining after a thermal cleaning cycle in your oven).
http://www.aeroelectric.com/Mfgr_Data/JB_Weld/JB-Weld-Technical-Datasheet.pdf
Consumer epoxies are generally quite high in x-link density which makes them difficult to swell with solvent, especially when they are in the glassy state (at room temp). When they are heated slightly (160F and above) and in the rubbery state they would be dramatically more susceptible to swelling, but then comes the challenge of getting them in the correct solvent (need a solvent with boiling point above 160F) and then you still have to deal with flammability (which most solvent have) at elevated temperature. This is probably an experiment that should be discouraged on the kitchen gas range top. Boiling in a water/glycol solution for an extended length of time may pay dividends here. If it were automotive glycol it would also have corrosion inhibitors present to minimize any corrosion that might occur. If trying this I’d look for a propylene glycol based coolant.Trying to think of another method...using a solvent to degrade epoxy. Some of the types used for dealing with petrol tank coatings should work...but effectiveness will come down to how much can reach the epoxy along the threading area.
Could also consider chopping off the stacks with a grinder and then using careful application of a dremel cutting wheel getting remaining threaded section out....
A liquid cooled automotive head will run somewhere near the coolant temp - 200F? - unless we were talking about something extremely close to the EX port where it would be higher. That said the epoxy would have been in the rubbery state when the engine was hot, so pretty weak. I have no idea what the repair you refer to involved, but just thinking out loud I’m envisioning a hairline crack radiating out from the stud mount on the boss. I’ve personally seen several cast iron motorcycle cylinders with cracks radiating out (away from the bore) from threaded head bolt holes that never progress into anything serious. Perhaps the JB was applied in the stud hole and performed extraordinarily, where the boss would have failed rapidly without it. Or, IMHO more likely is the same repair scenario, but the crack never would have propagated with or without the JB. We’ll never know but to each his one truth in the matter.I've been watching this with interest as my introduction to JB Weld was back in the 80's.
Had the heads off of a SBF for a valve job. Machine shop called and informed me we had cracked rocker boss.
Replace the head or.................JB Weld it. Doesn't recommend it, won't guarantee it, but would at least try.
Gave it a try. My mom drove the car for another 20k miles, then sold it, it went to Texas and that's the last I heard of it.
I think about it from time to time, specifically with this thread.
How hot does a cast iron, Small Block Ford head get? Apparently not hot enough to affect JB Weld.
Too bad Burlen doesn't sell just the bodies.I don't want to damage the stacks (or the carbs) so either they stay as is or are removed in one piece. The latter doesn't seem likely to happen so I figure I now own a set of Amal Concentric Premiers with permanently attached velocity stacks!So I'll look at the filter socks. I was also just now wondering if I could use the ham can filter and fabricate some sort of gasket that would seal the front plate of the ham can to the stacks. One problem with that solution is that with the stacks mounted, the mouth would be about an inch from the rear plate of the ham can. I have no idea if that proximity would interfere/alter airflow so as to obviate the benefit of the stack.
Personally I would use some tin snips and cut the stacks down to the carb and then grab them with some pliers and peel them off.
Then a fine wire brush in a bench grinder will remove all traces of JB weld.