comnoz said:
Be careful with sintered metal pads on the front of a Norton. They are powerful but they also transfer a lot of heat to the piston and fluid -then the brakes can go away.
Good advice. Aside from the obvious of having fresh (less than 1 year-old fluid) good quality high dry boiling-point brake fluid, one additional thing that can be done, if needed, to help keep heat away from the piston/system is to use titanium brake-pad shims (between brake pad and caliper piston). They do work.
Titanium Thermal Barrier Plates. Titanium has only 40% or less of the thermal conductivity of the steel material used for brake backing plates. Placing these thin 6AL-4V titanium plates between the brake pad and caliper piston will reduce heat transfer approximately 70 degrees, giving your braking system more heat capacity and longer rebuild intervals. This is not Grade 2 Ti of other brands that can be purchased for 1/3 of the price - this is the good stuff. A must for track use - especially in heavier full-interior street cars and stock and prepared class racers.
I stated high "dry" boiling point fluid above, because I've never bought into the conventional wisdom of being really concerned about wet boiling point ratings. If you are like me and:
1) changing your fluid every 12 months or sooner
2) keeping your bike indoors most nights
3) riding only infrequently in the rain
Than wet boiling points for brake fluid really don't come into play and dry boiling points are what will matter. That presupposes that you are doing things properly and using only fresh brake fluid (unopened container), etc.
ashman said:
The best thing I ever done to my Norton was to get rid of the orginal brakes on my Norton, the older they get the more dangours they become, don't matter what pads you put in and how many times you rebuild them, one day they will let you down when you need them badly, my life is more important than keeping my Norton orginal, Ive done all the upgrades to the Commando front disc and one day they nealy killed me, spend the money and upgrade to moden brakes that work the way they should, stopping.
Ashley
Ashley, I'm not sure what your actual experience has been, but from mine I don't really see much difference between a "modern" brake caliper and a 40 year old Norton caliper, if comparing single or dual piston old systems to new equivalent ones. If we're comparing the old systems to a four-piston Brembo, etc., than sure, but that's apples to oranges. There is a world of difference between the braking power and feel of my 2004 BMW R1150RT and my 1975 BMW R90S, but the vast majority of that difference is in the master cylinders of the two and their bore, stroke, etc. I think virtually all if not all 40 year old bikes had far larger master cylinder bores than what is run today. You must remember that 40-50 years ago it was common-place to ride your bikes on gravel, dirt, and even grass. I certainly did, just like everyone else.
Cycle Magazine 1973 test - The brakes on the Commando were excellent and very much in keeping with the overall performance of the machine. The
Lockeed-Norton front disc was smooth and required little effort to bring the machine to a safe stable halt. The input is
predictable and there is little danger in locking up the front wheel.
TImes have changed and so have our expectations. Tha means addressing the master cylinder issue.
Cycle magazine also did a 7 bike "Superbike" shootout in 1973 and the Norton brakes out-performed all others except the Kaw 900 and 750. Pulling better Gs (just 0.006 Gs out of 1st) and stopping in a shorter distance for comparable speeds than the Honda CB750, Ducati 750, Triumph Trident, and H-D 1000. Add to that that the testers stated that the Norton's Avon tires were the limiting factor and that the Kaws had what the testers referred to as great Dunlop F6 tires that outperformed the Avons and you'll see that The brakes were actually very good for their time. I never had any trouble with CB750s, Kaw 750s, etc., in the 70's with Dunlop TT100s on my 850. The brakes were great for the available rubber of the day. Modern rubber means that bikes can use more braking force now than they ever could before.
If both new and old can lock the wheel, than it becomes a matter of feel and effort as well as fade resistance, but these are functions of the master cylinder and brake pads not of the calipers. Brake calipers are extremely simple pieces but do require proper maintenance and periodic proper rebuilds. This is true of OE Norton calipers and all new ones, both will be junk if this isn't done and both will work great if it is. Both have to be maintained and will easily lock the wheel with two-fingers
IF using an appropriately sized master cylinder. That is where, I believe, the OE Norton has a real issue, the master cylinder. It is my understanding that Norton deliberately used a larger than optimal bore size to actually reduce the effectiveness of the front brake as discs were new and they were concerned about them being too strong. I know that's a laugh now, even my 1975 R90S has scary weak front brakes with dual rotors, but that is about 90% a master cylinder issue, as I think it is with the Norton.
I'll be fitting a 13mm master cylinder and Ferodo Platinum pads to my Norton during the rebuild this winter and will then have current feedback then versus my recollections from my original 850 that I parted with in 1976.