chasbmw said:with a revised mastercylinder ratio and modern pads the brakes on my 75 R90 are fine, wet and dry. I will keep the original disc on my Commando, but get it bead blasted and zinc plated.
Apart from the rusting, the other big downside with cast iron discs is that they weigh a lot more than equivalent stainless.
I had an 83 BM G/S, and its stainless brakes needed a bit of time to wipe dry before they had any bite.
(So do drum brakes after they've been through the river Matty - read ze handbooken)
Cast iron disks are usually heavier because they have the intregral central hub in iron too.
Stainless is usually heavier per volume than castiron, depending on the grades.
But the ss rotors can be thinner for equivalent strength.
Its often that lightweight alloy centre that makes them (SS) lighter...
What is the coefficient of friction of zinc plating ?
You may lose a lot of the braking performance like that.
Cast iron rotors are good braking precisely because iron has a higher coefficient of friction.
And the rust dust adds a bit !?
Keep em well used, and iron won't rust...