I thought I read somewhere that the old Burman/AMC/Norton/Commando box was being asked to do an awful lot coping with the Commando output, & that it was wise not to go too long legged on the gearbox sprocket as the extra torque was too much for what is basically a 1930s gearbox designed for engines of half that output.
where did I get that from? or did I dream it (don't answer that!).
mike996 wrote;When you think that the AMC box was designed to cope with 30 bhp from a 500cc
machine, it is not surprising that on 828cc machines giving about twice the power the reliability of the box
is not what it should be
I seem to recall something like that myself but have no idea where I might have heard it.
It seems to me very unfortunate that they did not change Commando gear ratios by using alternative
engine sprockets, because with a larger engine sprocket and retaining say, a 19T on the gearbox (as was
standard on all Norton Nortons from Model 50 to Atlas and Manx) the speed of the box would be
increased without such a heavy journal load on -the bearings and tooth loading on the pinions
themselves. > >
Myford said:I thought I read somewhere that the old Burman/AMC/Norton/Commando box was being asked to do an awful lot coping with the Commando output, & that it was wise not to go too long legged on the gearbox sprocket as the extra torque was too much for what is basically a 1930s gearbox designed for engines of half that output.
where did I get that from? or did I dream it (don't answer that!).
Terry
Fullauto said:850s had a 21 tooth sprocket as standard, not 20. MK3s had a 22tooth.
maylar said:Fullauto said:850s had a 21 tooth sprocket as standard, not 20. MK3s had a 22tooth.
My '74 Roadster came from the factory with a 20T. Maybe the Interstates had a 21?
Fullauto said:maylar said:Fullauto said:850s had a 21 tooth sprocket as standard, not 20. MK3s had a 22tooth.
My '74 Roadster came from the factory with a 20T. Maybe the Interstates had a 21?
The only one I've ever heard of with a 20 tooth as standard.