Historicly : Through out the racing years machines where improved to produce status for the manufacturer, if a improvement was made that won race's others would copy/improve on that...it was not about the most original machine comming last, but the quickest comming first! ^60's" manx 47-48 BHP ,Bob Mac tried to improve engine output to 50 plus,but couldnt. Todays Manx are 60 bhp,
Duncan Fitchetts Manx with plain bigend, Nic Bore, and special tuned inlet/exhaust kicks out 60 bhp, but all that was not good enough to produce winning results, the handling needed up-grades to match.
Pat Green's GB access team wanted to win race's not just enter, If some one produced a special item that give another 5 bhp, everyone would want it, or a differant damper that enabled higher corner speed..RS 125 or what ever?
Many years ago i fitted Bultaco dampers inside norton forks, we had to hide the extra length with gaiters, the guy won the british tele-ridgid trials
I agree there as to be a limit,and there is. But surly as BHP increase's the chassis as to match? otherwise the machine can become unsafe?
.
acotrel said:
I was at an historic road race meeting a while back, and there was a kid with a big mouth there. He shouted to his father who had a manx 'Dad, is this the bike with the RS125 cartridges'. I'm probably a bit funny about Manx Nortons and G50s, however I believe you ride them for the experience of what real racing used to be like. If you want to get serious buy an R1, or a Fireblade. Would you paint a moustache on the Mona Lisa to make it better ?