Here ya go, he keeps pulling out the good stuff, check his other items
http://www.ebay.com/itm/300874163676?ss ... 1423.l2649
http://www.ebay.com/itm/300874163676?ss ... 1423.l2649
Snorton74 said:Sounds like your into the full meal deal. Drilled cases and breather mod should also be on the list, then you can join the oil tight club.
johnm said:Not a particuarly helpful comment now but I would hazard a guess and say that this bike once sat for a long time (years) before being put back into service.
It look like it has stuck rings and surface rust on the cam body. If you start a bike from long storage without pouring oil down the push rod tubes you will tear up the cam immediately.
On the plus side inside the combustion chamber and piston tops look good for a bike with this mileage.
Looks like its going to be a nice bike
worntorn said:Easily confused here, does the bike belong to Swooshdave, MJ Friesen or both?
Glen
Blue noser said:I think they are brothers, that's what I get out of it. :?
dantriumph said:Hi All.
This is my first post here on this excelent forum, though I´ve bin member for some time and have read many interresting threads.
I have a MKIII and have had it for about 10 years. I have 2 cams that looks like the one in the photo. When we found the first one we (my dad and I, he has a 750) thought it was just a "soft" cam, as all the stories tell. Fitted a new standard cam, that was also soon gone, then we got suspicious. Then a Megacycle cam, that seems to be okay, at least it was last time I had the chance to have a look at it.
If this is a lube problem, then why is it always the left inlet and only the left? Why not both inlets or left in and outlet? Till now, noone has bin able to come up with a good reason???
Dan Christoffersen. Groningen, The Netherlands.
Blue noser said:I think they are brothers, that's what I get out of it. :?
Rohan said:Wow !
Did you have to adjust the valve(s) every tank of fuel...... !
Or it just rattled a bit.....
ludwig said:valve clearance is set against the base circle , so camwear has no influence on it .
( lifterwear would ..)
worntorn said:Blue noser said:I think they are brothers, that's what I get out of it. :?
I figured out that they are brothers but couldn't understand why they both seemed to speak as though they owned it. Makes perfect sense tho, knowing that their Dad is the rightful owner! :mrgreen:
A friend owns an rc 51 of which he is very proud. He posted up on the BC sportbike forum that their are just three kinds of people
1. Those that own an RC 51
2. Those who have never owned and RC 51 and desperately want one
3. Those who have sold their RC51 and wish they had not.
His 40 year old son also is on the forum, he posted under his Dad's statement. According to the son, there is also a fourth type of person. The fourth type is someone who intends to inherit an RC51. :mrgreen:
Glen
2nd most.swooshdave said:Since I tend to be the most verbose on the forum I thought I'd get some feedback.
: