Triumph saw fit to put 2 balancer shafts in the 1200 , which also has a 270 crank.
Even the Daytona 955i Triple has a balancer. You can lay your hand on the tank at idle or 12,000 rpm/ 161 bhp with negligible vibration felt.
If the balancer shafts are hurting power output in those two, engines, it's not noticed.
I think the balancer shaft is a wonderful thing. We can have an engine run at 12 or 14 thousand rpm, make insane power and without the need to build half the bike out of rubber ( 750/850 Commando) trying to get away from the vibration. I love my old Commandos, but the rubber mounting is kind of a hokey way to utilize a tremendously out of balance engine. At that we still suffer some annoying shaking below 3000 rpm. A 270 crank could help a bit, but with the higher revs used now in most modern engines to get at higher power, ugly vibrations would likely remain.
It makes sense that someone decided to fix the engine to solve the problem. I suspect balancer shafts are here to stay. If they are made correctly, they are brilliant!
Glen
Even the Daytona 955i Triple has a balancer. You can lay your hand on the tank at idle or 12,000 rpm/ 161 bhp with negligible vibration felt.
If the balancer shafts are hurting power output in those two, engines, it's not noticed.
I think the balancer shaft is a wonderful thing. We can have an engine run at 12 or 14 thousand rpm, make insane power and without the need to build half the bike out of rubber ( 750/850 Commando) trying to get away from the vibration. I love my old Commandos, but the rubber mounting is kind of a hokey way to utilize a tremendously out of balance engine. At that we still suffer some annoying shaking below 3000 rpm. A 270 crank could help a bit, but with the higher revs used now in most modern engines to get at higher power, ugly vibrations would likely remain.
It makes sense that someone decided to fix the engine to solve the problem. I suspect balancer shafts are here to stay. If they are made correctly, they are brilliant!
Glen
Last edited: