Another Isolastic question.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 12, 2015
Messages
493
Country flag
Hello.
I have a 75 850, when checking the Iso gap, is .006 the total or should I have .006 on both sides?
Right now I have about .012 on one side and .000 on the other, front and back mounts.

thanks
 
The general idea is to lever the engine to the right (timing side) and take your measurement from the primary side... so if you're showing 12 thou this way, you should have 6 thou on both sides (in theory anyway). Just make sure you check at multiple point around the iso collar
 
Thanks for the info!
Great straight answers, I'm a bottom line guy.
Although reading the ebb and flow of conversation on this forum are very interesting and helpful.
Every new bike I get I learn how much I don't know, that's fun part, learning. Other than riding (of course).
 
Every new bike I get I learn how much I don't know, that's fun part, learning. Other than riding (of course).

I'm at the same point. I'm not too sure how much shake/rattle/roll I should be expecting. I can see the engine vibrating in the cradle at start-up and at idle (~ 1100 rpm) but its smooth as can be on throttle while riding. I didn't bother with the measurements; far too fiddly for my liking. I just tighten the forward iso bolt 1/16 of a turn until it looks/felt right.

And it seems to be working which would say to any sane (read non-Norton) person; don't fix it. But I'd still like to know how much shake is too much.

BC
Toronto
71 Commando
68 TR6P
 
Stillreel said:
I didn't bother with the measurements; far too fiddly for my liking. I just tighten the forward iso bolt 1/16 of a turn until it looks/felt right.

And it seems to be working which would say to any sane (read non-Norton) person; don't fix it. But I'd still like to know how much shake is too much.


That's not really the right way to go about it as pete.v already explained to you.
vernier-isolatic-adjustment-t12662.html#p152340
 
Stillreel said:
Every new bike I get I learn how much I don't know, that's fun part, learning. Other than riding (of course).

I'm at the same point. I'm not too sure how much shake/rattle/roll I should be expecting. I can see the engine vibrating in the cradle at start-up and at idle (~ 1100 rpm) but its smooth as can be on throttle while riding. I didn't bother with the measurements; far too fiddly for my liking. I just tighten the forward iso bolt 1/16 of a turn until it looks/felt right.

And it seems to be working which would say to any sane (read non-Norton) person; don't fix it. But I'd still like to know how much shake is too much.

BC
Toronto
71 Commando
68 TR6P

Yes, at idle it's expected to jump around. Smooths out once underway. (Volumes written on what RPM the transition takes place)
Like a rubber mounted FLH. :idea:
Or, as Dad used to say, "shaking like a whore in church" :P
 
My bike before adjustment at about 3500 rpm it wound start smoothing out, the sweet spot is about 4200, great for freeway speeds. Haven't ridden since adjusting.

I like this quote from concours "Or, as Dad used to say, "shaking like a whore in church" :P
 
My bike before adjustment at about 3500 rpm it wound start smoothing out, the sweet spot is about 4200

from what you said it would seem you are at least 500rpm higher when smoothing out than when Commando ISOs are set correctly, maybe you are too tight?
 
1up3down said:
My bike before adjustment at about 3500 rpm it wound start smoothing out, the sweet spot is about 4200

from what you said it would seem you are at least 500rpm higher when smoothing out than when Commando ISOs are set correctly, maybe you are too tight?

Well the ISO's are close to .006 now, .012 before. Its going together as we speak. Ill let you know the results on test drive this weekend.
 
MS850 said:
1up3down said:
My bike before adjustment at about 3500 rpm it wound start smoothing out, the sweet spot is about 4200

from what you said it would seem you are at least 500rpm higher when smoothing out than when Commando ISOs are set correctly, maybe you are too tight?

Well the ISO's are close to .006 now, .012 before. Its going together as we speak. Ill let you know the results on test drive this weekend.
Ya know, there is no set rules here and no 2 bike are exactly alike. It all depends on your comfort level. Add and remove, front and back until you say, "Yahtzee".
 
MS850 said:
1up3down said:
My bike before adjustment at about 3500 rpm it wound start smoothing out, the sweet spot is about 4200

from what you said it would seem you are at least 500rpm higher when smoothing out than when Commando ISOs are set correctly, maybe you are too tight?

Well the ISO's are close to .006 now, .012 before. Its going together as we speak. Ill let you know the results on test drive this weekend.
6 thou will be good ,i will be hung for this but i have vernier isos on mine including an extra iso under the gear box and another iso as a head steady and i just adjust them until they are tight and then back them off until the motor and transmission will go up and down ,the bike is not as smooth below 2500 rpm as a stock commando but i like it this way the handling is superb cheers baz
 
MS850 said:
My bike before adjustment at about 3500 rpm it wound start smoothing out, the sweet spot is about 4200, great for freeway speeds. Haven't ridden since adjusting.Well the ISO's are close to .006 now, .012 before.

Took on test drive, the results, before below 3500 low frequency vibration now a higher frequency vibration. Above 3000 a slight vibration felt mostly in the foot pegs. The engine feels tighter, less movement. I'll live with this for now.


(On a side note, I had the Carb off and found a slightly plugged pilot jet, runs better at 0-1/4 throttle.
On another note the rt pea-shooter weld broke near header pipe. The weird thing is I ordered a new set of pea-shooters from Commando Specialties 3 days ago.I ordered new ones cause the chrome was bad.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top