850 Cylinder wear

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you do have the rings that came with the pistons, just for the heck of it measure the depths and compare.

Also, in the two pics of the expanders, the Hepolite from Danno appears to be the far better piece compared to the Hastings. Much more prominent and sharper ridges at the inner circumference would more positively located the scrapers I would think. I wonder if the Hastings unit were setting up some sort of a "flutter" because of poor scraper to expander relationship? How does the other cylinder compare?
 
Biscuit said:
If you do have the rings that came with the pistons, just for the heck of it measure the depths and compare.

Also, in the two pics of the expanders, the Hepolite from Danno appears to be the far better piece compared to the Hastings. Much more prominent and sharper ridges at the inner circumference would more positively located the scrapers I would think. I wonder if the Hastings unit were setting up some sort of a "flutter" because of poor scraper to expander relationship? How does the other cylinder compare?

The wear pattern on MS850's cylinder walls are from the fact that the expander puts pressure on the backside of the rail slightly unevenly.
The initial wear is at the points where the pressure from the expander is the greatest.
We are talking about wear that is visible -but so small it is virtually un-measurable. Just shiney spots.
As the rings and bores break-in the wear pattern will become even and you will no longer see the streaks.
I have seen this pattern before with some types of rings and yes I do prefer the original Hepolite ring set.
But give it a few thousand miles, instead of two thousand miles and they will look great. Jim
 
Danno said:
For Bill; 750 Norton Hepolite 3-piece oil ring spacer. Should I mail it to you so you can examine it more closely?


850 Cylinder wear

I thinks YOU should look at your 750 3 PIECE OIL RING EXPANDER very closely, assemble it up and see how it works, better still cut 1'' off the ends and assemble your engine with it.

I reckon the the hone patterns to coarse and chattery, the white discolouration is has come from the oil control rail finish, used to be chrome type of finish, cooking itself to the bores, you didn't submit to the dry ring start terrorists by any chance did you ?
 
no need to mail it as dances has already pointed out to you and as i have tried to show you the vertical tabs on the inside circumference is where the rails receive there outward pressure.

Danno said:
For Bill; 750 Norton Hepolite 3-piece oil ring spacer. Should I mail it to you so you can examine it more closely?


850 Cylinder wear
 
comnoz said:
[
The wear pattern on MS850's cylinder walls are from the fact that the expander puts pressure on the backside of the rail slightly unevenly.
The initial wear is at the points where the pressure from the expander is the greatest.
. Jim

If you look closely at the picture Jim you can see the compression rings have scuffed the bores in the same place as the white discolouration, indicating, to me anyway, that the cylinder walls are creating the high spots
 
comnoz said:
You do not want to shorten the expander. It is there to supply the tension that keeps the oil ring rails against the cylinder wall. Jim

I'd like to see a spring scale pull test with and without the spacer or expander or whatever you want to call it to quantify how much tension it actually provides the scrapers.
 
splatt said:
Danno said:
For Bill; 750 Norton Hepolite 3-piece oil ring spacer. Should I mail it to you so you can examine it more closely?


850 Cylinder wear

I thinks YOU should look at your 750 3 PIECE OIL RING EXPANDER very closely, assemble it up and see how it works, better still cut 1'' off the ends and assemble your engine with it.

I reckon the the hone patterns to coarse and chattery, the white discolouration is has come from the oil control rail finish, used to be chrome type of finish, cooking itself to the bores, you didn't submit to the dry ring start terrorists by any chance did you ?

I don't have a 750 any more, just leftover parts from an old top-end overhaul. My 850, which got top-ended more than 20 years ago is running just fine and I never advocated cutting anything. I think YOU should read the individual posts as you are mixing them up. And maybe YOU should do the spring scale pull test and actually prove or disprove what you are probably just repeating from the words of someone else. Which you also may have gotten mixed up.
 
Danno said:
comnoz said:
You do not want to shorten the expander. It is there to supply the tension that keeps the oil ring rails against the cylinder wall. Jim

I'd like to see a spring scale pull test with and without the spacer or expander or whatever you want to call it to quantify how much tension is actually provides the scrapers.

Don't know how one would accomplish this as the expander also does indeed has a duty to positively locate the scrapers on the roof and floor of the oil groove. Without an expander they would just fold up. The part in question does two things I suppose.

It keeps the scrapers located (separated) so it's a separator.

It exerts pressure to the scrapers by expanding them outward so it's an expander.

It's an expanderator. Or maybe a seporander.
 
I don't think spring steel scrapers would fold up. They'd just slip to the top land of the oil ring groove and stay there as long as the spring scale kept pulling on the wristpin. There's enough outward tension to keep the whatchamacallit snug against the inside edges of the scrapers, but I'd bet anyone here a case of beer it's like the fly bending the steel bar; not enough to measure. Do the test and prove me wrong and I'll buy you a case of your favorite beverage. Show no measureable difference and you owe me one. Put your beer money where your mouth is.
 
splatt said:
comnoz said:
[
The wear pattern on MS850's cylinder walls are from the fact that the expander puts pressure on the backside of the rail slightly unevenly.
The initial wear is at the points where the pressure from the expander is the greatest.
. Jim

If you look closely at the picture Jim you can see the compression rings have scuffed the bores in the same place as the white discolouration, indicating, to me anyway, that the cylinder walls are creating the high spots

If the compression rings were "scuffing" also then why does the "scuffing" stop at the point of the upper travel of the oil ring instead of going all the way to the top of ring travel?
 
Danno said:
I don't think spring steel scrapers would fold up. They'd just slip to the top land of the oil ring groove and stay there as long as the spring scale kept pulling on the wristpin.

Yup that would work. Did not think it through. But not sure what it would prove. The scrapers alone would obviously be pretty wimpy as fare as exerting pressure against the wall.... Without the huge assist from the expandaspacer.
 
Something not yet covered here is whether this is on BOTH cylinders, or just one cylinder ??
 
comnoz said:
Danno said:
Modelo Dark it is.

Cool, I would prefer delivery at a future motorcycle event when you can sit down and have one with me. Jim

Happy to make that program. I retire at the end of this year and will have much more free time (and less money! haha) to do what I want.

Will you be at Barber Vintage Days this fall? I have a room and some pit passes if you're interested.
 
Danno said:
comnoz said:
Danno said:
Modelo Dark it is.

Cool, I would prefer delivery at a future motorcycle event when you can sit down and have one with me. Jim

Happy to make that program. I retire at the end of this year and will have much more free time (and less money! haha) to do what I want.

Will you be at Barber Vintage Days this fall? I have a room and some pit passes if you're interested.


That didn't come out quite right. Four of us are riding down and my buddy who races electric bikes has 6 pit passes available. All I have to do is get him the names a week prior to the event.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top