comnoz said:You do not want to shorten the expander. It is there to supply the tension that keeps the oil ring rails against the cylinder wall. Jim
Yup.
comnoz said:You do not want to shorten the expander. It is there to supply the tension that keeps the oil ring rails against the cylinder wall. Jim
Biscuit said:If you do have the rings that came with the pistons, just for the heck of it measure the depths and compare.
Also, in the two pics of the expanders, the Hepolite from Danno appears to be the far better piece compared to the Hastings. Much more prominent and sharper ridges at the inner circumference would more positively located the scrapers I would think. I wonder if the Hastings unit were setting up some sort of a "flutter" because of poor scraper to expander relationship? How does the other cylinder compare?
Danno said:For Bill; 750 Norton Hepolite 3-piece oil ring spacer. Should I mail it to you so you can examine it more closely?
![]()
Danno said:For Bill; 750 Norton Hepolite 3-piece oil ring spacer. Should I mail it to you so you can examine it more closely?
![]()
comnoz said:[
The wear pattern on MS850's cylinder walls are from the fact that the expander puts pressure on the backside of the rail slightly unevenly.
The initial wear is at the points where the pressure from the expander is the greatest.
. Jim
comnoz said:You do not want to shorten the expander. It is there to supply the tension that keeps the oil ring rails against the cylinder wall. Jim
splatt said:Danno said:For Bill; 750 Norton Hepolite 3-piece oil ring spacer. Should I mail it to you so you can examine it more closely?
![]()
I thinks YOU should look at your 750 3 PIECE OIL RING EXPANDER very closely, assemble it up and see how it works, better still cut 1'' off the ends and assemble your engine with it.
I reckon the the hone patterns to coarse and chattery, the white discolouration is has come from the oil control rail finish, used to be chrome type of finish, cooking itself to the bores, you didn't submit to the dry ring start terrorists by any chance did you ?
Danno said:comnoz said:You do not want to shorten the expander. It is there to supply the tension that keeps the oil ring rails against the cylinder wall. Jim
I'd like to see a spring scale pull test with and without the spacer or expander or whatever you want to call it to quantify how much tension is actually provides the scrapers.
splatt said:comnoz said:[
The wear pattern on MS850's cylinder walls are from the fact that the expander puts pressure on the backside of the rail slightly unevenly.
The initial wear is at the points where the pressure from the expander is the greatest.
. Jim
If you look closely at the picture Jim you can see the compression rings have scuffed the bores in the same place as the white discolouration, indicating, to me anyway, that the cylinder walls are creating the high spots
Danno said:I don't think spring steel scrapers would fold up. They'd just slip to the top land of the oil ring groove and stay there as long as the spring scale kept pulling on the wristpin.
comnoz said:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dz-8fSHiyZA
Danno said:Modelo Dark it is.
comnoz said:Danno said:Modelo Dark it is.
Cool, I would prefer delivery at a future motorcycle event when you can sit down and have one with me. Jim
Danno said:comnoz said:Danno said:Modelo Dark it is.
Cool, I would prefer delivery at a future motorcycle event when you can sit down and have one with me. Jim
Happy to make that program. I retire at the end of this year and will have much more free time (and less money! haha) to do what I want.
Will you be at Barber Vintage Days this fall? I have a room and some pit passes if you're interested.