- Joined
- Oct 19, 2005
- Messages
- 18,978
From Doug Mcquire in Oregon on how simply complex a Commando's nature can be... speaking to another list, so nothing personal here...
You guys are missing a major point in engine vibration, Namely, the engine.
Engine balance issues almost always come down to manufacturing flaws. Of course the design is the primary cause with the vertical twin, but all in all, BSAs, Norton and Triumphs all are really pretty similar.
It comes down to how well each one was put together. Early BSAs i suspect had the best quality control, followed closely by Triumph, with Norton a VERY distant 3rd.
A Norton, regardless of C-do or earlier all have many flaws and faults, but in my experience, and i live a very short distance from Kenny Dreer, as well as some other very knowledgeable Norton builders and Tuners such as Sir Eddy, Mike Ferrell, DJ, Dick Slusher and others who have even more experience than I do all comes down to if you want to solve the majority of your vibration problems then carefully blueprint the internals, and balancing solves the rest.
I have a GREAT dynamic balancing shop i use, every Norton crank i have had done was WAY off in balance, a huge amount of rocking couple, as well as casting variations.
Once corrected people cannot believe the difference. I have seen some commandos that would shake your teeth out even with the Iso's.. problem solved with the dynamic balance.
When Eddy started the LSR project i gave him a number of Commando cranks. On one he found the throws had been off, mismachined. 20 or 30 thou difference from one side to the other (email him and ask the specific number)... do you think that might effect the vibration a bit?
We found another crank where it had never been apart from the factory, but we learned why it probably was parked and taken apart,,, or at least why i think so,,
the factory lock tabs were still in place, but once prised away, we found the bolts for the crank assy/flywheel were only finger tight. Again, any guess's on if that would effect vibration?
Ive also found piston and pin combos where they varied by 7 grams from one side to the other, any speculation?? any ??
Eddy says a very common issue is machining tolerances and dimensions related to the cylinder to the case and the crank, running crooked parts might have something to do here with vibration...
Another friend,,, who has owned many Nortons over the years including some he bought new off the dealer floors speculated on how some were better than others, some were perfect and needed almost nothing in Maintenance,,, others were constant problems. The ongoing issue again and again is how well it was put together, some bikes were midmorning wednesday bikes, some were beer thirty bikes.
Nortons are usually great bikes, but many of their problems could have been avoided if they had built them properly in the first place instead of expecting the owners to accept these problems or sort them themselves.
plenty of anecdotes from Nortons own staff about the garbage they knowingly shipped out the door.
Harley learned this the hard way too in the AMF years,, and how recommitting to quality brought them back into the success they grew too.. An antiquated design, but improved to asian bike reliability over the years, No mystery how HD ended up with so many people riding their bikes... something its a shame Norton didnt do. Imagine where we would be today if they had.
You guys are missing a major point in engine vibration, Namely, the engine.
Engine balance issues almost always come down to manufacturing flaws. Of course the design is the primary cause with the vertical twin, but all in all, BSAs, Norton and Triumphs all are really pretty similar.
It comes down to how well each one was put together. Early BSAs i suspect had the best quality control, followed closely by Triumph, with Norton a VERY distant 3rd.
A Norton, regardless of C-do or earlier all have many flaws and faults, but in my experience, and i live a very short distance from Kenny Dreer, as well as some other very knowledgeable Norton builders and Tuners such as Sir Eddy, Mike Ferrell, DJ, Dick Slusher and others who have even more experience than I do all comes down to if you want to solve the majority of your vibration problems then carefully blueprint the internals, and balancing solves the rest.
I have a GREAT dynamic balancing shop i use, every Norton crank i have had done was WAY off in balance, a huge amount of rocking couple, as well as casting variations.
Once corrected people cannot believe the difference. I have seen some commandos that would shake your teeth out even with the Iso's.. problem solved with the dynamic balance.
When Eddy started the LSR project i gave him a number of Commando cranks. On one he found the throws had been off, mismachined. 20 or 30 thou difference from one side to the other (email him and ask the specific number)... do you think that might effect the vibration a bit?
We found another crank where it had never been apart from the factory, but we learned why it probably was parked and taken apart,,, or at least why i think so,,
the factory lock tabs were still in place, but once prised away, we found the bolts for the crank assy/flywheel were only finger tight. Again, any guess's on if that would effect vibration?
Ive also found piston and pin combos where they varied by 7 grams from one side to the other, any speculation?? any ??
Eddy says a very common issue is machining tolerances and dimensions related to the cylinder to the case and the crank, running crooked parts might have something to do here with vibration...
Another friend,,, who has owned many Nortons over the years including some he bought new off the dealer floors speculated on how some were better than others, some were perfect and needed almost nothing in Maintenance,,, others were constant problems. The ongoing issue again and again is how well it was put together, some bikes were midmorning wednesday bikes, some were beer thirty bikes.
Nortons are usually great bikes, but many of their problems could have been avoided if they had built them properly in the first place instead of expecting the owners to accept these problems or sort them themselves.
plenty of anecdotes from Nortons own staff about the garbage they knowingly shipped out the door.
Harley learned this the hard way too in the AMF years,, and how recommitting to quality brought them back into the success they grew too.. An antiquated design, but improved to asian bike reliability over the years, No mystery how HD ended up with so many people riding their bikes... something its a shame Norton didnt do. Imagine where we would be today if they had.