Uh-oh!

The two shells were found just as the photos show. The big end nuts were not even finger tight. I figure another couple minutes running and the connecting rod would have blown through the case.
Finger tight? Could you turn the nuts with little resistance? If so, it seems more likely to me that it was all caused by the person who last assembled the engine re-using stiff nuts that were no longer stiff and perhaps not tightening them properly, not by a lack of lubrication.
Nuts unscrew, piston hits valves, shells now free to move and disaster happens.
 
Disassembled my crankshaft today and used a fine grade sandcloth to remove the aluminum deposits on the timing side journal. Pictures are from a rag wipe down only. Will clean properly tomorrow. Are the journals within specs to use standard size shells or must it be reground?
 

Attachments

  • Uh-oh!
    20230901_213654.jpg
    551.2 KB · Views: 200
  • Uh-oh!
    20230901_213811.jpg
    437.4 KB · Views: 187
  • Uh-oh!
    20230901_213846.jpg
    430.2 KB · Views: 200
Disassembled my crankshaft today and used a fine grade sandcloth to remove the aluminum deposits on the timing side journal. Pictures are from a rag wipe down only. Will clean properly tomorrow. Are the journals within specs to use standard size shells or must it be reground?
Pay to measure properly with a micrometer, most of those verniers are made in China,
 
Pay to measure properly with a micrometer, most of those verniers are made in China,
Shelby is right. That crank needs to be measured in tenths.
Also, the surface finish must be polished with crocus cloth.
Paying an accomplished engine builder to do this is a good idea.
After suffering the failure it has, it would be hard to imagine it would be serviceable without regrind.
 
Got my crankshaft back from the machine shop today. Only one regrind required. Looks so, so much better.
 

Attachments

  • Uh-oh!
    20230921_182546.jpg
    268.6 KB · Views: 150
  • Uh-oh!
    20230921_182555.jpg
    253.7 KB · Views: 150
  • Uh-oh!
    20230921_182609.jpg
    287 KB · Views: 153
I’m looking to buy a used connecting rod from someone on here. I tried to list on the want to buy area but it wasn’t working for me. If someone has a usable con rod please PM me. Thanks, Larry.
 
I have the same radius gauge set; for the 0.090 radius, do you use the 3/32 radius gauge (0.093")?
Of course. The three thousands of an inch difference of radius, would be hard pressed to be discerned visually by even the most seasoned veteran machinist.
 
Last edited:
Of course. The three thousands of an inch difference of radius, would be hard pressed to be discerned visually by even the most seasoned veteran machinist.
had to look; found this for $24;

Starrett® 167-090 - 167 Series™ 0.090" SAE Stainless Steel Radius Gauge​

 
had to look; found this for $24;

Starrett® 167-090 - 167 Series™ 0.090" SAE Stainless Steel Radius Gauge​

A simple .180" gage pin (found in EVERY machine shop) swaddled with prussian blue will tell the story as well
 
I had a very large tea cup my workmates smaller ones so jealousy caused them to drill a hole halfway down the side of mine. The day I discovered this I had gifted them identical cups to mine.

To their credit they were mortified and from then on mine had duct tape on the side courtesy of the perp. You just cannot make this stuff up!
 
Back
Top