ZFD said:Though I knew most of it, the general public may be astonished. The more so, as the usual rags have hoorayed the affair for so long:
http://www.bikerglory.com/2012/08/the-n ... #more-2177
We have seen seriously underfinanced attempts at re-starting Norton several times before, and all know how they ended. Only those who believe in miracles may go on believing in this one.
The real problem is the cost per bike against sales price. Industry calculation is that 1/3rd of a bike's retail price can be spent on manufacturing cost, otherwise you cut corners on quality, marketing, spares, warranty, development, and, most important for the survival of a company, profits that can be re-invested.
Nigel Griffiths told us that when his bike was in for servicing, the top end was removed for no apparent reason. His suspicion was that it was urgently needed to furnish another bike.⁸ It wouldn’t be a huge surprise, since Egli’s statement and the manager’s statement corroborate each other regarding the constant problems with supply of spares.
camshaft said:L.A.B. said:ZFD said:This could become interesting: http://www.bikerglory.com/2012/07/norton/
I hope so-because it isn't at the moment - just the usual journalistic hype. :roll:
We publish 18.00 BST (ie GMT +1) this evening, 15 August. Read the statements and then tell us how much of it is hype.
http://www.bikerglory.com
ZFD said:Hoorayers of the world, unite, then!
I have nothing against start-ups, Swooshdave, but the sad fact is that to start a certain kind of business you need a certain amount of money. Single-figure millions, even two-figure millions (which were never there), get you nowhere in the costly world of the modern motor cycle industry. R&D in a competitive environment, added to which the ever-more restrictive emissions legislation, dictate a minimum amount one must start with.
Bloor is hailed here again and again, and called to the rescue. My sympathies for him are limited, but the one thing I have to give him is that his start-up was well financed and could digest the early years and the inevitable flops.
This was the first thing the old hands of Norton- ex Shenstone men- questioned about this start-up: "Does he know what it costs?"
ZFD said:Swooshdave,
James Lansdowne Norton started with a bought-in engine and a bicycle frame in an environment overeager to buy means of self-propelled transport with virtually no legal restrictions, all from a little workshop whose only inhabitant, I suspect, was a certain James Lansdowne Norton.
If he eventually made it into producing his very own motorcycles a hundred years ago, what does this tell me about today's motorcycle industry?
ZFD said:Swooshdave,
James Lansdowne Norton started with a bought-in engine and a bicycle frame in an environment overeager to buy means of self-propelled transport with virtually no legal restrictions, all from a little workshop whose only inhabitant, I suspect, was a certain James Lansdowne Norton.
If he eventually made it into producing his very own motorcycles a hundred years ago, what does this tell me about today's motorcycle industry?
ZFD said:Swooshdave,
James Lansdowne Norton started with a bought-in engine and a bicycle frame in an environment overeager to buy means of self-propelled transport with virtually no legal restrictions, all from a little workshop whose only inhabitant, I suspect, was a certain James Lansdowne Norton.
If he eventually made it into producing his very own motorcycles a hundred years ago, what does this tell me about today's motorcycle industry?
Snorton74 said:Norton recently received $ from the govt for expansion
dirtymartini said:Very sad indeed, Norton's good name will be drug through the mud much like Indian. !