Smooth bonnie

If T140's did not get balanced then it is seriously disturbing that Royal Enfield Inters were dynamically balanced. If they figured it out what on earth happened to Triumph?
My '73 Bonnie could remove your tooth fillings. By 71 BSA removed anything bolted on to it.
Enfield were making tiny numbers of Series 2 Interceptors, compared with Meriden’s output.
 
I had an oif t120v that vibrated incredible badly but it was bored to +60 without any rebalancing so that may have played a part
I had a tiger tr7 that was ok ish
My t140e was pretty good even after I changed the 7.8 -1 pistons for some t140v 8.5 -1 type
Worst vibrating bike I ever owned was a 750 commando motor fitted in a wide line
Closely followed by a plunger A10 and a BSA B44 that some idiot thought he could change his own big end bearing and re align the crank himself with a big lead hammer ,tyre levers,and a pair of steel wedges!!!
 
I arbitrarily raised the balance factor on my current pre-unit 650 Triton by taking off the crankcase filter and cover and enlarging a hole in the flywheel with a hand-held drill.
 
Enfield were making tiny numbers of Series 2 Interceptors, compared with Meriden’s output.
Yes but then the workforce was tiny too. Triumph had the people, brains and money to get or make a balance machine. Odd that Hele did not go there. One of the most noticeable things about later brit bikes was bad vibration. Trident was one answer, Isolastic suspension another so clear that the problem was well known and worth addressing.
 
As mentioned earlier, some pics or the AV or “Enforcer” frame as Triumph called it. Apparently only 50 bikes were made utilizing it, which is a shame.

3719735785_d6ddb5bc56.jpg


Bottom engine mounts..

26E19A57-3CB0-C543-A5F3-9A0A232685CD.jpg


Rear engine mount and pivot.

BACED09F-9FD7-408B-92A0-F3852DB382E7.jpeg

It would be pretty simple for a welder / fabricator to replicate.
 
As mentioned earlier, some pics or the AV or “Enforcer” frame as Triumph called it. Apparently only 50 bikes were made utilizing it, which is a shame.

View attachment 116722

Bottom engine mounts..

View attachment 116721

Rear engine mount and pivot.

View attachment 116720
It would be pretty simple for a welder / fabricator to replicate.
How did they mount the silencers?
The main reason I moved away from triumph twins was the vibration ,that and the clutch
This setup may have kept me with them for longer
 
That is an ENORMOUSLY wide engine for a twin - wider than a honda 4 maybe?

If you hate a big twin's vibes that much - just buy an e-bike
 
Last edited:
How did they mount the silencers?
The main reason I moved away from triumph twins was the vibration ,that and the clutch
This setup may have kept me with them for longer
I’m not sure about the exhaust mounting TBH, but I know the strengthened the front downpipes brackets. ( I always thought they looked tinny anyway (and crap)). But I guess they used bobbin mounts like the Commando?
 
I’m not sure about the exhaust mounting TBH, but I know the strengthened the front downpipes brackets. ( I always thought they looked tinny anyway (and crap)). But I guess they used bobbin mounts like the Commando?
I was thinking there'd be a lot more movement at the exhaust mount with the motor moving in an arc
But I guess if it's only moving a fraction at the front of the motor it'd be fine
 
I seem to remember an article in MCN back when I used buy it that said something like "the Muppets at meriden are finally balancing the cranks"
And I took that as to mean dynamically balanced
As obviously even triumph would have always statically balanced their cranks?
Not sure I'd believe anything printed in MCN, or as we used to call it, Motorbikeysnooze, the worlds best selling anesthetic.
A mate of mine has a 1987 Harris Bonneville with the TSS type crank, all be it with reduced big end diameters, & it feels quite different to my 1977 TR7v, & is really quite smooth.
 
I seem to remember someone making 180-degree cranks for 650s and part of the reason being to reduce vibration. That seems simpler than added counter-balance hardware and seems like it would make the static balancing done by the factory easier/quicker.
 
Not sure I'd believe anything printed in MCN, or as we used to call it, Motorbikeysnooze, the worlds best selling anesthetic.
A mate of mine has a 1987 Harris Bonneville with the TSS type crank, all be it with reduced big end diameters, & it feels quite different to my 1977 TR7v, & is really quite smooth.
I had a Harris Bonnie in ‘86 ish. I was only a yoof and absolutely caned that bike keeping up with my Jap mounted mates.

It was much smoother than other Triumphs I’d ridden, although time makes direct comparisons unreliable, I do believe my current dynamically balanced T140 is smoother.

Here it is outside its birthplace. Note bottle of oil stuffed into grab rail to keep it topped up !

Smooth bonnie
 
I had a Harris Bonnie in ‘86 ish. I was only a yoof and absolutely caned that bike keeping up with my Jap mounted mates.

It was much smoother than other Triumphs I’d ridden, although time makes direct comparisons unreliable, I do believe my current dynamically balanced T140 is smoother.

Here it is outside its birthplace. Note bottle of oil stuffed into grab rail to keep it topped up !

View attachment 116740
I would love to buy one of those to try, but they seem to have been under developed & have too many problems built in. Also, if I blew the engine up finding spares might prove somewhat problematic. Still wish I'd bought a kit from Dave Nourish for my TR7. I did contact his successor about a kit of parts, but luckily started to hear the horror stories before parting with any cash.
 
I would love to buy one of those to try, but they seem to have been under developed & have too many problems built in. Also, if I blew the engine up finding spares might prove somewhat problematic. Still wish I'd bought a kit from Dave Nourish for my TR7. I did contact his successor about a kit of parts, but luckily started to hear the horror stories before parting with any cash.
Are you referring to a Harris Bonnie? The vast majority of parts are interchangable / easily replaceable with Meriden stuff.

Regarding Dave Nourish, his son Andy is slowly building up to supply more and more Nourish replacement stuff. He’s just finished some new heads. I don’t think it will be too long before he offers an 8 valve conversion for T140s again.
 
Back
Top