I never expected the world would be moving in this direction but I'm proven wrong each day. Planned and calculated obsolescence is keeping the world working and buying and selling. Manufacturers improving their products, but not too much, just enough to make you want to buy the latest and greatest, until they introduce version 2, then 3 , then the new and improved one.
Look at what we're discussing. Comparison of a hopefully high quality product with a similar hopefully high quality product, and trying to justify product "RELIABILITY" by by saying which one of the two must be the LEAST UNRELIABLE. In my life I've set standards for myself that II try to stick to and live by. One of these is; It does not make me look better to point out someone else's faults. Another is; you don't have to tell people you're great if you're great. Live the example you want to be and let them see it for their selves. Pretty sure perfection has been gone for close to 2018 years now.
There's an awful lot of concerns on this section trying to justify the Norton 961 cost, value, reliability etc.. Face facts, these bikes are not a major player in the motorcycle population of the planet and that's not why we bought them. We have to justify the cost to ourselves only. The value is going to be there for us and those of like minds. These bikes will be as reliable as we make and keep them. Maybe I can't repair my cellphone and it's made to go in the trash after a few years, but somebody will inherit my 961 one day. Hope there's petroleum left.
Charlie