Hello and good afternoon from Germany,
well, I had a Maney cylinder barrel. The bore was 79mm, as far as I can remember. I also got it Nicasil- plated from SMA- Racing in Germany. As they are more experienced in single cylinder racing (Matchless G50), they recommended a piston to cylinder clearance of 0,03- 0,04mm (with custom made Mahle pistons). No, I said that would certainly too little for a twin and ordered a clearance of 0,06mm. When I received the whole set- up I measured 0,10mm , which would have been too big. Anyway I never got it really running because of certain other issues.
What gave me the biggest headache was the fact that I never got a really well sealed cylinder head gasket. I always opted to copper gaskets, which would give the best heat transfer between the cylinder head and the barrel, apart from Jim's solution. Anyway, I gave it up and went back to the standard cast iron, which is certainly only the second- best solution. After all, the engine was always intended to be ridden on the road.
I suspect that due to the open cylinder bolts the cylinder was always distorted.
So, to me the Molnar cylinder barrel (theoratically) has its biggest advantage with through - bolts completely inclosed into the casting. A distortion seems to be reduced to an absolute minimum with this solution. This is the biggest advantage of the Molnar solutuion.
Now to the Nicasil- coating: The cast iron liners have a completely different thermal expansion in comparison to aluminium. I have seen Dunstall cylinder barrels with cracked liners in the area of the head gasket. The reason being that the liner was pulled downwords into the crank case resulting in the cracked liner. This again can result in liners pulled down into the crank case by the piston rings while the engine is running (A complete desaster, happening to Roger Titchmarsh with his 500cc Nourish Weslake). The solution is, that the liner has an interference fit so that it can partially move within the cylinder barrel. This certainly cannot be an ideal solution, because due to capillary action oil will creep in between the barrel and the liner. So, the heat transfer between the liners and the barrel is interrupted. I know that Honda and most of he Japanese manufacturers had this solution. But to me, the best solution is the Nicasil- plated cylinder.
Another word to thermal expansion. The problem is definately not the expansion as such, but the different expansions between aluminium and cast iron (different materials). So with an cast iron cylinder the cylinder head, the cylinder barrel and even the crankcase are working against each other instead of working together. So, even here we have a big advantage of aluminium barrels (and not only the lighter weight and the better heat transfer).
That's my thinking about the Molnar cylinder barrel. I would try it but, being a pensioner the financial resources are rather tight.
Best Regards
Klaus