Linked Commandos

Status
Not open for further replies.
Would the front link in line with the front ISO not stop this happening though?

Cheesy, I'd think front link in line near iso would tame a lot of the side slapping.
But front link alone did not transform Peel handling, what it did do was remove the front tire sense of hunting on its own, like rain grooves, road ripples and side glances off stones. I still had to back off in leaned power sweepers d/t hinged onset, more scary than prior because it let me go in a bit faster but the hinge or weave freg was higher too > so harder to react too and closer to tire grip resonance. I count my front link as worth 15% of the full set.
 
Postby swooshdave » Tue Mar 22, 2011 2:55 pm
I'm still of the opinion that coupled with the isolatics all the rod ends do is prevent any measurable side movement due to the isolatic gap. Basically that .10in gap isn't allowed to slop around because it's controlled.

Well we both totally agree, IF I'd mounted my links close and inline with the isolastic, but I didn't Some have proposed to just use rod links in place of isolastics. In Peels case if I set iso's much below factory gap I got a buzz on leans. The way I did Peel - can not stop iso gap narrowing but apparently resisted contact set near factory spec. I like mine a bit more open than factory for extra smoothness, Peel flat disappeared to pilot sensation.

I gave more thought to the engine tipping to bind iso rubbers in a tilt that would spring back. This power unit tipping on iso axis causes rear wheel to change aim. At speed it only take a silly mm or so to be noticed, a lot.
Turn you forks at 60 mph the slightest you can and see.
 
Thats kind of what I was thinking, the links give a frictionless (I hate using that word) restraint only allowing forward-backward and up-down movement. Maybe there is more too it than this though?

Yes triple links sure does that in spades, but it does not a rigid Commando make.
Here in lies a key phenomena to me, the steel tube frame can still twist up, even if the relation of power unit to frame is mostly stabilized by rod. My sense of it is the tires going in different directions, front aimed outward - rear along the tangent, twist chassis, that takes out a lot of the tire conflict of traction and control. On moderns I twist up they snap back so harsh they ring back into forks and tires toward crash zones. On Peel she either just relaxes as I ease loads off, or if I cut loads fast by power or forks to Neutral, she unwraps rubber band fast but with just as much rebound as a limp rubber band after release.

its this sling shot unwrap at point of least traction, ie: apex, I call phase 4 handling, to induce it takes straight steering Plus tripping out with power to get the hi side to save me while also turning bike on its CoG while in the air.
It literally allowed controlled crashing on purpose in eager no effort glee.
Well ok jet pilot breath control is needed to combine these one after another.
All the elite racers talk about that don't they? Pashaw.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top