worntorn said:The battery on the second bike is a 9pb/eq. This was the suggested battery to replace a 7 ah lead acid. We now know it is not adequate. Why rate something as a 9 amphour lead acid equivalent when it is not? At best this is very misleading advertising. Is it likely that the salespeople for these products all know that the pb/eq number is pretty much meaningless unless you divide by three? Or do they sell based on that number, which is the intention of the number in the first place, pb/eq, lead/equivalent?
Glen
Amperage: 6.9 Amps/Hour
Lead Acid Equivalent Amperage: 20 Pb-eq/Ah
Burst Cranking Amps: 410amps
These spec's are from Ballistic's 12 cell. They pretty much tell it all, at least they list the true Amps/Hour rating and the
"Pb/EQ" rating. It's about 3:1. There are two characteristics that make Lithium batteries unique. Low internal resistance and low capacity. The low internal resistance means they have very fast charge and discharge rates compared to lead/acid. That's where the "410 Burst Cranking Amps" comes from. In a stroke of genius someone wondered what capacity lead/acid battery would it take to match that cranking power. "Pb/Eq" was born. For most people on modern bikes with 400-500watt alternators that probably have better charging profiles than our dead till idleX2 units the Lithium is a fine match.