- Joined
- Nov 12, 2012
- Messages
- 86
Not sure I can afford the 765.00 though. And not sure i will ever find a used one.
Dkt26 said:Sorry but I'm learning,
does the hotter spark negate the need for the advancing spark at higher rpm on the commando side mount unit? Is the advance mechanism within the timing chest of the atlas style mounted Maggie just there because its there or does it perform a function of some measurable benefit that the side mounted version does not?
I love the idea and look but I have had so many ignition problems, I'm over it. Points- pain in the arse. 3 trispark units that have all blown up due to manufacturer issues ( replaced under warranty) and now Boyer that has worked ok, but I have no faith in.
Let me get this straight, you run a Joe Hunt mag on your Commando, on the end of the cam, with no automatic advance? And, you set up your static timing at 28 degrees BTDC?jseng1 said:Dkt26 said:Sorry but I'm learning,
does the hotter spark negate the need for the advancing spark at higher rpm on the commando side mount unit? Is the advance mechanism within the timing chest of the atlas style mounted Maggie just there because its there or does it perform a function of some measurable benefit that the side mounted version does not?
I love the idea and look but I have had so many ignition problems, I'm over it. Points- pain in the arse. 3 trispark units that have all blown up due to manufacturer issues ( replaced under warranty) and now Boyer that has worked ok, but I have no faith in.
The hotter spark just makes for better ignition of the fuel. It has nothing to do with the timing. Full advance is always going to be the same - preferably at 28 degrees. The Auto advance unit lets you start the bike with the ignition retarded and that reduces the chance of kick back at the kick lever. It may also reduce chance of pinging when letting out the clutch at low RPM.
But you don't hear many complaints. The advantages remain.
check out videos
starting with magneto demo
http://youtu.be/3D4VIzMNNYM
machinist going the extra reinforcing mile (or you can reinforce with JB weld according to the instructions if you really thing its necessary - Evil Kenievel jumps etc).
http://youtu.be/ZVE1ZzlsXhM
concours said:Let me get this straight, you run a Joe Hunt mag on your Commando, on the end of the cam, with no automatic advance? And, you set up your static timing at 28 degrees BTDC?
johntickle said:When you spin the rotor clockwise on the drive side it turns anti clockwise on the points side. I think you only need the "anti clockwise" mounting plate for the points and a set of "anti clockwise" points.
worntorn said:I often wonder what the advance curve looks like with the Boyer. It feels as though the engine goes to full advance as soon as rpm picks up from idle.
concours said:Based on automotive experiences, I'd have thought that 28 degrees of advance at cranking speeds would cause the crankshaft to want to turn backwards when the fire was lit that early. :shock:
=====================================================The Pro-Mag 44® is the King of all magnetos! Producing an amazing 44 amps of primary current, it’s no wonder that the Pro-Mag 44 is the choice of top fuel dragster and funny car teams!
============================================================bwolfie said:If you look at the evolution of the aviation industry, Mag Ignition was the standard for the bulk of time. But in recent years there has been a switch to a redundant EI system. So I would say a Mag is cool and does work well. But a good EI system will also work well. Nowadays it comes down to preference. With a mag there are more parts to wear out, but with an EI there are lots of little electronic parts to fail. 6 of one half a dozen of another. Also to add to this, the aircraft EI systems also get used with EFI. Again removing another old technology.
RoadScholar said:My son is an aircraft mechanic, he works for a .org in the east that has a B24, B17, Mustang, and many other vintage planes, all with magnetos; he swears by their reliability and their performance. He and I agrue about the virtues of all solid state (my position) versus these electro-mechanical wonders. So , I claim that the solid state produces a more consistent, repatable spark, has less moving parts and puts out a hotter spark which doesn't trail off with RPM, he claims that a mag puts out an ever increasing spark with RPM, but acknowledges that the engines he works on rarely exceed 3000 RPM.
So does a mag do a better job of igniting the mixture than, say, a TriSpark with a 5 ohm dual fire Dyna coil, supplied with the juice from a Sprax high out put charging system??
Or
Is the mag just a period piece that allows the standard charging system to light the way at night or is it a real, respectible, performance piece that out shines electronics????
Wondering.
Bill.