NoneYup , mine came with my bike , less miles , same story ....
Well my combat still has the factory installed Amals with over 58000 miles. They were, sleeved by Gaylord at 20,000 miles so not really a fair comparison. They sure work good though. Sorry couldn’t resist.
Isn’t it daylight down there. Quit typing and go outside and play...with your Commando.
They do work very well on a Norton what's the reason for posting this?
Probably better to compare a twin mikuni setup with a twin concentrics setup?Because I see so many posts saying how Anals are so wonderful and how the Premiers are much better, and then I see a number of posts telling how to fix them. Some people still can't get over the war. Heaven forbid if somebody fitted a pair of Bings.
Are those twin instruments unfiltered Nigel?
My personal preference is a single TM 40
Are those twin instruments unfiltered Nigel?
You must have much better air quality over there than we have!
Very surprising really - given how much bullshit seems to be flying around over Brexit!
Well, none really. But then, it was on the bike when I got it and it's only done 65,000 miles since. So, not really a fair test in comparison to a pair os Anals.
just sayin'.
.... seriously what is difference at top end
That’s funny ! ..... need some examples of the twin amals running glitch free for similar mileage , with no fiddling .... then it would be hilarious .... seriously what is difference at top end , after all these years only went there once ... guess me personally has no need of twin setup .... in fact I did try twin vm32 mikuni on this bike only difference I noted was fuel use went up slightly ... it just a Sunday morning bike now so single works fine and any more than a day ride out , I ride something else ... have not touched the mik since I jetted and mounted it , I drain for winter but that not fiddling .....we all know this is circle discussion , right haha!