To start with , Jims work is excellent.
Tony Maughan ,who i meet a few times machined solid muffs with greater wall thickness,the original Vincent cast muffs "let go" and oil crept between the liner and muff.
Cast iron as less hight "expansion" and the holding down bolts dont get streesed [iron and steel expand together] i assume a water cooled engins [less expansion] is kinder on alloy cylinders...and holding down bolts.
consider all the triple tightening on new head gaskets, due to expansion with commando's
Jim must love this work as his program time must be days :!:
I had a few Wellworthy Triumph 650 cylinder's which where great , cast muffs... velocettes returned back to iron in the later years.
Iron liners in alloy frett, contraction and expanding ..all that said Jim is appling his skills and showing us mortals an insight into his world ,and that we must applaud!
uote="johnm"]Serious question - with a purpose because I may go this route one day with a 500 barrel.
Over the years I have read and been told conflicting things about the usefulness of alloy barrels on our kind of bike.
Rolland Pike reported significant hp loss with the use of alloy barrels on works Gold Stars until they installed very thick cast iron liners.
Read half way down this page. These are actually a very interesting set of articles for the budding classic racer !!!!!
http://beezagent.blogspot.ro/2009/01/ro ... er-23.html
Dave Nourish was most unhappy about them. He personally told me he tried alloy barrels on his Nourish engines before going back to cast iron.
So has anyone done any testing to show they are a great idea. The weght saving is clear but what about engine performance?
John[/quote]