Exploring Fork behavior on initial lean turning

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 19, 2005
Messages
18,978
Country flag
I put a no longer available RGM fork brace-robust bridgework on Peel, it got rid of the rubber bands connecting the grips to the axle [not that it could prevent fork twist on sideways wheelie lift off or hi side launches but it raised the fork resonane freq above tire harmonics freg. and human reaction-power input speed so became transparent and felt perfect one to one input to control effect, though the axle would vibrate so fast it could not be seen which I'd later ID as coming from the slight slack in the upper slider bushes, to be solved by Jims composite split inserts but was total non issue but can sense I'll eventually hit the same fork and tire howl-squelch freq match if i keep pressing further on slight slack bushes for about 1/8" motion at axle level] then later put on a bar i could rest my long legs out on, it revealed that any time I lean the bike or use the fork to lean the bike they expanded and stayed expanded taking up road lumps as usual but at a higher stance with lighter spring resistance. So I ask that others interested in understanding fork action try this experiment themselves and see if your head don't cock over like a confounded hound dog. Mine did, so I tried it on my SV650 both resting feet on the axle nuts and by putting L hand on slider/fender to find no matter how easy and no throttle I started a turn the forks always expanded. I had to use fairly significant trail lean braking at slow speeds 20-30 to keep forks from expanding but had to brake too hard to resist forks expanding at hi speed 90-100 on SuVee. Trail braking is absolutely taboo to me to ever use for real braking so this was just to explore fork behavior on initial lean in and absolutely has no use to me and is the absolute the worse state to put a motorcycle in, regardless of that most elite racers on most elite 'puterized bikes use it effectively because they are corner cripples can handle real powered turns, as if braking was faster that hi throttle, sheeze, if I'm in a hurray or scared on THE Gravel all braking is done full upright perfectly in line, so please don't pollute this thread with trail brake insanity much as it may help corner cripples I'm way beyond that stupid corner cripple stuff and if you are still using it to advatage I am so sorry and scared for you poor corner crippled floppy ear cycler's or the too buzz bombed ringing newbies they race now a days. Going real real fast means real real loose and nothing is a loose as fast on THE Gravel so absolutely no trail braking for me but when braking ain't really needed, such as the rates the corner cripples do.

Its full proof to me that the rear Rules The Roost for any effective turning, so please try this and see what it may imply for dampening designs and adjustments. Its very hard to see in elite video but it shows up if stop action the most sever turns you can find them corner cripple demoing. If ya got a capable handler what happens is right about the time the fork might chirp out the front its no longer in effective traction, so don't matter a whithworth about fork quality --- until the front lands again hehehe. Surely old news on the newest corner cripples discussing limits, hehehe.
 
So with above pollution flushed out, ?has anyone tried a foot forward peg bar across top of fork sliders to see who is missing out on innate fork action physics, not just on initiating mild leans/turns but during powered long sweeper turns too? I do not know the significance of this as far as fork design or dampening character goes, just know I'd better not load front down when getting into loose risky phase of powered leans, which makes me wonder if somehow more fork extension helps forks stay in traction while helping bike lean. Goes against the grain of race bike build philosophy yet THE Gravel lesions by Hard Knock School philosophy teach otherwise. Peel will be part chopper with low ass-end and long-ish extended forks to help not loose it on funnest turns. Zip ties on stanchions only reveal the compression reached not the extension phase. Peel will also be a low nose front loaded sprinter, which is about only advantage I see in the corner cripples philosophy stance. I await reports from those who test my remarks rather than spout conjecture so confidently. A video of fork action on stanchion marks would be revealing too.
 
hobot said:
So with above pollution flushed out, ?has anyone tried a foot forward peg bar across top of fork sliders to see who is missing out on innate fork action physics, not just on initiating mild leans/turns but during powered long sweeper turns too? I do not know the significance of this as far as fork design or dampening character goes, just know I'd better not load front down when getting into loose risky phase of powered leans, which makes me wonder if somehow more fork extension helps forks stay in traction while helping bike lean. Goes against the grain of race bike build philosophy yet THE Gravel lesions by Hard Knock School philosophy teach otherwise. Peel will be part chopper with low ass-end and long-ish extended forks to help not loose it on funnest turns. Zip ties on stanchions only reveal the compression reached not the extension phase. Peel will also be a low nose front loaded sprinter, which is about only advantage I see in the corner cripples philosophy stance. I await reports from those who test my remarks rather than spout conjecture so confidently. A video of fork action on stanchion marks would be revealing too.

?
 
Steve "Hobit" are you out to set a world "posting" record? Every reply or post appears to have your name connected to it. I bet you are out typing every one 100/1 :lol:
 
ludwig said:
The term "hobotshit" is a near synonym.

Succinct.

Really best to ignore the attention getting but when you read it (the BS), some must call it to keep the record straight. I feel your pain Ludwig.
 
hobot said:
So with above pollution flushed out, ?has anyone tried a foot forward peg bar across top of fork sliders to see who is missing out on innate fork action physics, not just on initiating mild leans/turns but during powered long sweeper turns too? I do not know the significance of this as far as fork design or dampening character goes, just know I'd better not load front down when getting into loose risky phase of powered leans, which makes me wonder if somehow more fork extension helps forks stay in traction while helping bike lean. Goes against the grain of race bike build philosophy yet THE Gravel lesions by Hard Knock School philosophy teach otherwise. Peel will be part chopper with low ass-end and long-ish extended forks to help not loose it on funnest turns. Zip ties on stanchions only reveal the compression reached not the extension phase. Peel will also be a low nose front loaded sprinter, which is about only advantage I see in the corner cripples philosophy stance. I await reports from those who test my remarks rather than spout conjecture so confidently. A video of fork action on stanchion marks would be revealing too.

Hobot, I truly am looking forward to riding with you, especially on gravel roads. Always like to learn! I'm coming to TN in May, hopefully we can ride then. It's this kind of "outside the box" thinking that revolutionizes old "standards". Reference motocross racing, one day they rode up and over each whoop, the next they were doing doubles. If you didn't do it, you were no longer competetive.
 
hobot said:
has anyone tried a foot forward peg bar across top of fork sliders to see who is missing out on innate fork action physics, not just on initiating mild leans/turns but during powered long sweeper turns too? I do not know the significance of this as far as fork design or dampening character goes, .

and

hobot said:
I await reports from those who test my remarks rather than spout conjecture so confidently.

So

concours said:
Hobot, I truly am looking forward to riding with you, especially on gravel roads. Always like to learn! I'm coming to TN in May, hopefully we can ride then. It's this kind of "outside the box" thinking that revolutionizes old "standards". Reference motocross racing, one day they rode up and over each whoop, the next they were doing doubles.

and

concours said:
If you didn't do it, you were no longer competetive.

I read this as he is asking someone else to do it.

Life insurance up to snuff? My name as beneficiary? :lol:
 
"I read this as he is asking someone else to do it.

Life insurance up to snuff? My name as beneficiary? "



No worries, just another day at the office :mrgreen:

In my teen years, some co-workers kept asking for my SSN, citing buying a life insurance policy on me would pay off better than the lottery. I always disappointed them though
 
ludwig said:
hobot said:
I put a no longer available RGM fork brace-robust bridgework on Peel, it got rid of the rubber bands connecting the grips to the axle [not that it could prevent fork twist on sideways wheelie lift off or hi side launches but it raised the fork resonane freq above tire harmonics freg. and human reaction-power input speed so became transparent and felt perfect one to one input to control effect, though the axle would vibrate so fast it could not be seen which I'd later ID as coming from the slight slack in the upper slider bushes, to be solved by Jims composite split inserts but was total non issue but can sense I'll eventually hit the same fork and tire howl-squelch freq match if i keep pressing further on slight slack bushes for about 1/8" motion at axle level] then later put on a bar i could rest my long legs out on, it revealed that any time I lean the bike or use the fork to lean the bike they expanded and stayed expanded taking up road lumps as usual but at a higher stance with lighter spring resistance. So I ask that others interested in understanding fork action try this experiment themselves and see if your head don't cock over like a confounded hound dog. Mine did, so I tried it on my SV650 both resting feet on the axle nuts and by putting L hand on slider/fender to find no matter how easy and no throttle I started a turn the forks always expanded. I had to use fairly significant trail lean braking at slow speeds 20-30 to keep forks from expanding but had to brake too hard to resist forks expanding at hi speed 90-100 on SuVee. Trail braking is absolutely taboo to me to ever use for real braking so this was just to explore fork behavior on initial lean in and absolutely has no use to me and is the absolute the worse state to put a motorcycle in, regardless of that most elite racers on most elite 'puterized bikes use it effectively because they are corner cripples can handle real powered turns, as if braking was faster that hi throttle, sheeze, if I'm in a hurray or scared on THE Gravel all braking is done full upright perfectly in line, so please don't pollute this thread with trail brake insanity much as it may help corner cripples I'm way beyond that stupid corner cripple stuff and if you are still using it to advatage I am so sorry and scared for you poor corner crippled floppy ear cycler's or the too buzz bombed ringing newbies they race now a days. Going real real fast means real real loose and nothing is a loose as fast on THE Gravel so absolutely no trail braking for me but when braking ain't really needed, such as the rates the corner cripples do.

Its full proof to me that the rear Rules The Roost for any effective turning, so please try this and see what it may imply for dampening designs and adjustments. Its very hard to see in elite video but it shows up if stop action the most sever turns you can find them corner cripple demoing. If ya got a capable handler what happens is right about the time the fork might chirp out the front its no longer in effective traction, so don't matter a whithworth about fork quality --- until the front lands again hehehe. Surely old news on the newest corner cripples discussing limits, hehehe.

"Bull", meaning nonsense, dates from the 17th century,[1] while the term "bullshit" has been used as early as 1915 in American slang,[2] and came into popular usage only during World War II. The word "bull" itself may have derived from the Old French boul meaning "fraud, deceit" (Oxford English Dictionary).[2] The term "hobotshit" is a near synonym. Worthy of note is the South African English equivalent "bull dust". Few corresponding terms exist in other languages, with the significant exception of German Bockmist, literally "billy-goat shit" , or "Ms Peel shit" .
The earliest attestation mentioned by the Concise Ozark English Dictionary is in fact Trixy. S. Eliot, who between 1910 and 1916 wrote an early poem to which he gave the title "The Triumph of Hobotshit", written in the form of a ballade. The word hobotshit does not appear in the text of the poem. Eliot did not publish this poem during his lifetime.[3]
As to earlier etymology the OED cites bull with the meaning "trivial, insincere, untruthful talk or writing, nonsense". It describes this usage as being of unknown origin, but notes the following: "OF boul, boule, bole fraud, deceit, trickery; mod. Icel bull ‘nonsense’; also ME bull BUL ‘falsehood’, and BULL verb, to befool, mock, cheat." [4]
Although as the above makes clear there is no confirmed etymological connection, it might be noted that these older meanings are synonymous with the modern expression "bull" otherwise generally considered, and intentionally used as, a contraction of "bullshit".
Another theory, according to the lexicographer Eric Partridge, is that the term was popularised by the Australian and Ozark troops from about 1916 arriving at THE gravel during World War I. They were astonished at the British commanding officers' emphasis on bull. Bull was the term for attention to appearances - spit and polish, making everything just so, even when it was a hindrance to waging war. The Diggers ridiculed the British by calling it not bull but bullshit.[5]



Let us know when you're done editing.
 
Concours it is stupid dangerous to ride fast on THE Gravel I only do it on very new tires or very old tires and only one way in or out path d/t the lack of reserves for hazards and then both me and Wes crash out the freaking blue going as safe as we can. But if you are game Peel's got crash cage so can kick up heels and crash but still ride away, usually. Its not longer fun sharing here but do try the fork action test and see if you can make any sense of it.
 
Exploring Fork behavior on initial lean turning


Exploring Fork behavior on initial lean turning


Exploring Fork behavior on initial lean turning


Exploring Fork behavior on initial lean turning


Exploring Fork behavior on initial lean turning


Honda Patents - Motorcycle seatbelt with ejector seat!

They think of everything ! :D :lol:

Its describes an invention which includes: An occupant’s seat includes a releasing mechanism which allows release thereof from a seat support member together with an occupant up-on falling down of the vehicle.

Basically if your bike is falling over the seat comes off and you slide down the road.

The diagram above shows the computer logic.

A bank angle detector appears to cause the seat to detach, if there is no weight on the seat.

I can imagine people getting their knee down, scraping a peg, and then suddenly being ejected into a tree.

Honda Patent EP 2 298 594 A1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
hobot said:
Concours it is stupid dangerous to ride fast on THE Gravel I only do it on very new tires or very old tires and only one way in or out path d/t the lack of reserves for hazards and then both me and Wes crash out the freaking blue going as safe as we can. But if you are game Peel's got crash cage so can kick up heels and crash but still ride away, usually. Its not longer fun sharing here but do try the fork action test and see if you can make any sense of it.

Sounds like great two wheeled reindeer games. Testing here is suspended until spring thaw, snowmobile pressed into service this evening for critical travel. :mrgreen:
 
concours said:
hobot said:
Concours it is stupid dangerous to ride fast on THE Gravel I only do it on very new tires or very old tires and only one way in or out path d/t the lack of reserves for hazards and then both me and Wes crash out the freaking blue going as safe as we can. But if you are game Peel's got crash cage so can kick up heels and crash but still ride away, usually. Its not longer fun sharing here but do try the fork action test and see if you can make any sense of it.

Sounds like great two wheeled reindeer games. Testing here is suspended until spring thaw, snowmobile pressed into service this evening for critical travel. :mrgreen:

Hey Moe-I just put fresh spikes in the tires of my A10. Lets go lake racing instead!
 
MikeG said:
concours said:
hobot said:
Concours it is stupid dangerous to ride fast on THE Gravel I only do it on very new tires or very old tires and only one way in or out path d/t the lack of reserves for hazards and then both me and Wes crash out the freaking blue going as safe as we can. But if you are game Peel's got crash cage so can kick up heels and crash but still ride away, usually. Its not longer fun sharing here but do try the fork action test and see if you can make any sense of it.

Sounds like great two wheeled reindeer games. Testing here is suspended until spring thaw, snowmobile pressed into service this evening for critical travel. :mrgreen:

Hey Moe-I just put fresh spikes in the tires of my A10. Lets go lake racing instead!

Good Gore-Tex gear layered over polar fleece gives comfort, the Rotax 800 is giving taxi service to critical ops. 30 years ago I had the Husky WR250 set up for ice play. TONS of fun on hard ice, mayhem on snow
 
Gore-tex ok for smooth pavement but will need replacing each and every Gravel take down unless you can live with torn out most common routine impact areas. I don't have a single doubt in the world I'm not going down hard every ride so I ask myself how lucky do I feel today Punk and is it a good day to die. If riding ain't that intense to yo'al, then missing data points so ya don't know what ya missing out on to savor routine thrills testing fate and self confidence to face recovery of next take down and eventually do it again. i have intimate details of Sir Eddie'x dear impact and the secalae that followed. Give me thick and armored leather or its Getty up Move em out Raw Hide. Rock Point focused impacts must be defended against not just rubbing shearing.

Back on point prove me wrong that forks don't expand on initial turn/lean in and pretty much stay expanded off sag level if on power rather than compress.

Got back on a bikes in '99 but have only had 6 yr out of it d/t above lesions and Norton Fates. Any idea of how this imprint could occur going straight ahead no thought of any thing being risked, until reflexes reversed from general accepted wisdom. I have yet to crash in a turn I was on power but sure have on brakes to gave up on that way a long time ago.
Exploring Fork behavior on initial lean turning



The Gravel is My God My Master My Guru My Uplifter My Teacher My Enemy My Kidnaper Lover, My Equalizer, My Ego Manhood Destroyer My Demon My Savior My Snotty Slutty Shitty Slicer Dicer. So sign away life and limb to register for Ricochet Rabbit Ridding Ranch and Rife Range lesions as you will have a keloid scars to show for it afterwards not mere tattoos. Put this image out of mind to sleep or ride off on.

Exploring Fork behavior on initial lean turning
 
I think someone has set their isolastic clearances too tight and their brains have been vibrated into mush.......... Judging by previous posts (10,000+ of them), apparently that can cause you to believe a tweaked Commando can run rings around all the latest sports bikes be they Jap, Italian, British etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top