different engine commando frame

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
2,199
Country flag
having seen all kinda combinations out there, frame/engine, i was thinking of possible options with the commando, then just when i started to look closer at what was out there, i finally realized that all the changes were on featherbed frames,

haven't seen a commando with a non norton engine so i figured the isolastics setup was an issue,

then i became aware of a yamando, so, what's the story with fitting another engine in a commando frame?
 
NVT fitted a Trident engine into one as an experiment, it is in the National Motorcycle Museum I believe.

I have seen pictures of at least 2 Honda 750 4 engines fitted.

One Triumph twin, a different take on the Triton theme!

There have been some Nourish engines fitted. When you consider that these come in 900 or even 960 format, and are a none unit parallel twin, that makes good sense!
 
several years ago I bought a part built special, a T160 motor in a Commando frame - no isolastics.
there was too much gusseting and exposed welding to ever make a good looking bike, and I was apprehensive that the frame could take the weight of the triple motor so I broke it up.
sam
 
Not a Commando, but a Featherbed...


different engine commando frame


Dude who inherited it from a late friend called it a " Norton Manx" chassis, "Kawaton"
 
trident sam said:
several years ago I bought a part built special, a T160 motor in a Commando frame - no isolastics.
there was too much gusseting and exposed welding to ever make a good looking bike, and I was apprehensive that the frame could take the weight of the triple motor so I broke it up.
sam
I bought a commando frame last year that had been run with a trident engine I wonder if it is your old one? ,,,,,baz
 
V twins doable? (1200 sportster engines can pack a punch)
https://www.google.ca/webhp?hl=en#hl=en ... ortster+hp
https://www.google.ca/webhp?hl=en#hl=en ... r+upgrades

also had a look at some modern twins with 360 deg cranks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamaha_XTZ_750 (think dohc 5 valve per cyl heads)

fi - computers at some point

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamaha_TDM850 (shift to 270 deg firing order at some point)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_F800S (wrong side belt drive scenarios, dohc 8 valve head, computers)

along with the twin cam dohc kawi from 76-84 (counterbalanced)

xs 650 yam sohc
 
baz said:
trident sam said:
several years ago I bought a part built special, a T160 motor in a Commando frame - no isolastics.
there was too much gusseting and exposed welding to ever make a good looking bike, and I was apprehensive that the frame could take the weight of the triple motor so I broke it up.
sam
I bought a commando frame last year that had been run with a trident engine I wonder if it is your old one? ,,,,,baz

Possibly Baz, I'm sure I saw the frame on ebay. I think the guy who bought it off me just wanted a log book with Norton 750 on it.
sam

The bike never ran while I had it and I'm pretty sure it hadn't run before me either
 
Unusual classic british bitza
https://www.flickr.com/photos/michel_67 ... 343112419/

pix
NVT factory prototype of a Norton Commando frame with a 750 BSA Rocket 3 engine
https://www.flickr.com/photos/900gts/42 ... 343112419/
looks like a triumph front end may not be a huge deal

first time i've seen this
BSA A7/A10 frame with a 750 Norton Commando engine mounted with the famous isolastic
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4137/487 ... e8f5_z.jpg
 
About the only reason (besides "because I can") for fitting another engine into a Commando frame would be the same reason Norton did it, to reduce the vibration from something with inherently large vertical plane balance forces, like a huge vertical single or 360 degree twin. Not much point in fitting something like a 4-cylinder or anything with a balance shaft. On the other hand, "just because I can" has it's own appeal. How about a Honda CR500 2-stroke, which is famous for breaking parts off due to vibration. On the other hand, a unit engine looks a little small in the space normally filled with a separate engine and transmission.

Ken
 
part of the reason for some folks is the great appeal of easy to find suitable cheap (to buy) good engines that are out there for the pickings,

i bet there will be more of that over time given the value and big (or certainly not insignificant) costs of staying or keeping the bikes original, even today, which is likely to just go up,

there will always be appeal, to just doing something different
 
trident sam said:
baz said:
trident sam said:
several years ago I bought a part built special, a T160 motor in a Commando frame - no isolastics.
there was too much gusseting and exposed welding to ever make a good looking bike, and I was apprehensive that the frame could take the weight of the triple motor so I broke it up.
sam
I bought a commando frame last year that had been run with a trident engine I wonder if it is your old one? ,,,,,baz

Possibly Baz, I'm sure I saw the frame on ebay. I think the guy who bought it off me just wanted a log book with Norton 750 on it.
sam

The bike never ran while I had it and I'm pretty sure it hadn't run before me either
i bought my frame off a bloke at kempton park autojumble it does look very well constructed its an 850 frame converted to take the trident motor i thought it was probably a t150 because it had norman hyde footrest plates set up for right hand gear change, i bought it to convert back to a commando special but there is no frame number that i can see,so i will look around further for another frame with a frame number! ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,baz
 
Danno said:
Not a Commando, but a Featherbed...


different engine commando frame


Dude who inherited it from a late friend called it a " Norton Manx" chassis, "Kawaton"

I wonder about the mentality of some people - to me that bike looks like DEATH !
A JAWA speedway engine fitted to that bike with an AMC box would be much better and much CHEAPER !
 
Danno said:
Not a Commando, but a Featherbed...


different engine commando frame


Dude who inherited it from a late friend called it a " Norton Manx" chassis, "Kawaton"


Some poeple just waste a good frame or they didn't know what they had, who knows how some think :x
 
It doesn't have some of the expected brackets a manx would have,
and it has pillion footpeg provision !!, so its not very manx :?:

For an engine that had a reputation of having a pig of a frame, a featherbed makes some sense - put it in the best frame around... ??
Would be interesting to hear how it went, just for curiousity value.
 
84ok said:
Unusual classic british bitza
https://www.flickr.com/photos/michel_67 ... 343112419/

pix
NVT factory prototype of a Norton Commando frame with a 750 BSA Rocket 3 engine
https://www.flickr.com/photos/900gts/42 ... 343112419/
looks like a triumph front end may not be a huge deal

first time i've seen this
BSA A7/A10 frame with a 750 Norton Commando engine mounted with the famous isolastic
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4137/487 ... e8f5_z.jpg

Don't know about the rear section, but the front of that "BSA" chassis has twin downtubes. More Commando than Beezer.
 
Danno said:
Not a Commando, but a Featherbed...


different engine commando frame


Dude who inherited it from a late friend called it a " Norton Manx" chassis, "Kawaton"

Do I see a Kawasaki Triple?
I had one of those.
That would be a crazy combination.
That motor in a good frame would be a great combination.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top