Much easier to avoid that fight, and go after a rich corporation, rather than a serial bankruptor.Fox was following the press conference claims from the President and others on Capitol Hill - not having a pop here, a genuine question. If this group are challenging Fox in court, why not also the administration and the President? Is it true that the President cannot be sued whilst 8n office?
For those wondering "why is the president pushing an unproven drug"?
Heres the answer, the Hydroxychloriquine connection.
"It just so happens that one of the largest manufacturers of the drug, Novartis, previously paid Trump’s now-incarcerated former personal attorney Michael Cohen more than $1 million for healthcare policy insight following Trump’s election in 2016."
https://lawandcrime.com/covid-19-pa...ccess-to-trump/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
"If DT says it, we must make it true."
https://www.axios.com/coronavirus-h...use-01306286-0bbc-4042-9bfe-890413c6220d.html
That article is very revealing....how the dynamics in the task force meeting are failing badly. You've got a finance guy and room full of stooges arguing about "scientific" data and the meaning, while the actual science folks (2 or maybe 3) can't get traction. The correct response from Fauci should have been "What exactly is your relevant experience for reviewing scientific data Mr. Navarro?" Navarro is Trump's economy guy, whose resume is from FOX news financial analysis shows.
The latest is, the Donald is inflating projected death numbers so he looks better when the figures turn out smaller."If DT says it, we must make it true."
https://www.axios.com/coronavirus-h...use-01306286-0bbc-4042-9bfe-890413c6220d.html
Toadies evidently don't NEED previous relevant experience to get a job in the Trump admin, just the ability to smile and nod whenever the Orange One makes one of his outlandish pronouncements. One wag called his son-in-law the "Alt-Right Pinocchio"That article is very revealing....how the dynamics in the task force meeting are failing badly. You've got a finance guy and room full of stooges arguing about "scientific" data and the meaning, while the actual science folks (2 or maybe 3) can't get traction. The correct response from Fauci should have been "What exactly is your relevant experience for reviewing scientific data Mr. Navarro?" Navarro is Trump's economy guy, whose resume is from FOX news financial analysis shows.