Cheesy said:
Well yes, although I would have said lower instead of negative though, not that it really makes any difference.
Indeed - a pressure lower than atmospheric IS a negative pressure, is it not, by definition ?
On the overrun, the gas pressure in the manifold is near a total vacuum - the engine is
pulling max vacuum, and with the throttle closed v little air is getting in.
Cheesy said:
Then just for Rohan it is entirely possible to have a higher than atmospheric pressure in the cylinder at valve closing
That then would mean more than 100% cylinder filling, would it not ?
The NIRVANA of engine designers/tuners...
It was said that manx nortons achieved 100+% cylinder filling at some rpms.
Although in the light of more recent engines achieving higher and higher outputs,
either they are getting 100+++% filling, or the manxs claims were exaggerated.
Its not that simple to measure such claims either.
Of course, supercharged and turbocharged engines can achieve way more than 100% cylinder filling,
depending on how much boost is applied. WW2 Spits with compound supercharging were (eventually)
boosted to +2x atmospheric pressure (30 psi) (?), to make up for the fact that they were generally
much smaller capacity than the opposition. This is considerably more than they ever would have been
permitted in peacetime aviation.
We still have seen nothing of what sort of gas speeds are achieved under the restriction of the carby slide there.
Anyone with any feeling for what these may be ??
Someone with a flow bench maybe, that has let the cigarette smoke waft into the intake,
and checked how fast it gets whipped into the works.
The exhaust gas comes out at a fair old velocity.
But then there is a lot more of it by then...