I will go and have another look under the bottom of the box. I definitely remember re-locating the bottom bolt slightly further back. I don't think the case on the six speed would be different from the five speed.
Looks like Chris beat me to it.
The oil I use in my TTI box is Motul 300 75-90 which is one of the 2 TTI recommended. I get it off Amazon............
Al, I had a discussion with a forum member today who suggested it was possible that your Seeley had originally been built using an AMC gearbox shell. Thus when you later tried to fit a Commando type, you would have to alter one or the other mounting points.I owe you an apology. The new bottom holes in my engine plates are 25mm further back and 5mm further down. But their location depends on the angle of the adjustment slot. If my slot was angled slightly up at the front, the box would probably have fitted without re-drilling the bottom holes. On my bike the outer gearbox case has ended up horizontal. It is probably angled slightly up at the front in a Commando.. The top bolt moves in a circle as the position of the box is changed to tighten the primary chain. If the angle on the slot is wrong, the top bolt tightens in the slot as the box rotates and you don't get enough adjustment.
The adjustment slot on the Commando is probably cut with a radius . Mine is straight.
Norton models like the P11 and N15 had a gear box shell designed to be fit in very close to the engine. There are also different locations of where the clutch cable enters the outer cover.Isn't the Commando box the same as AMC ? I thought British motorcycle manufacturers never designed anything new when they could use an old design. If it was Japanese, I could understand it. With their bikes, each model can be designed from scratch They are not dog's breakfasts like Nortons.