kommando
MEMBER
- Joined
- May 2005
- Messages
- 7,988
I assume not, just because the friction losses are so very low does not negate the flow being lower on the drive side as the timing side has had its share already. That's why you need to model the whole system, its very complex and the hole position around the journal also comes into play. When one engine customer was presented with a model output that told him the crank big end journal hole was in the wrong position he ignored the recommendation, then the test engines started failing from worn big ends and he changed his tune. As you say the centrifugal also comes into play which we know will keep oil going to the big ends and produce an oil film even with the crank end seal gone as long as the crank end hole is flooded with oil so no air can get in.I understand pressure loss along a pipe as a concept (Box’s formula IIRC).
But in this case, the ID of the pipe (ie the central chamber) and the close proximity of the relevant holes, would mean an almost incalculable loss between the first and second hole I imagine.
We also have the added complexity of centrifugal force acting on the oil. Which, assuming neither hole is starved, would surely be equal on both holes?