Jeandr said:
wrench said:
And dead on, so many folks have no problem spending $40,000 for a chromed-up ill-handling Harley (more for a custom chopper). If you have that kind of cash to burn, why not at least buy a proper bike? ;-o
wrench
People who live in glass houses should not throw stones...
People who built their houses out of straw are probably in worse shape when the the big bad wolf comes 'round. And if your stone hits the target the first time, nothing wrong with living in a glass house. Enjoy the views it provides, I say.
A Commando is fine as a bike, it looks like one and performs like one, but don't expect one to be any better than the latest offerings from Japan, Europe or even a Buell. Time marches on and time is very hard on machinery.
I never really met anyone who thinks their Norton will perform "better" (a rather nebulous term, to be sure. It depends on what you mean by it) than the "latest offerings" out there. But I do so admire the spirit of curiosity and drive and love of making one's Norton perform better, look better, last longer, ride longer, handle better, etc., etc. To me that is part of the joy of all. Of course you can have a conservationist's approach, just keep it stock and don't monkey-around with it, fine. But to deny the spirit of improvement and joy it brings, whatever standard one is shooting for, is limiting to the extreme. I applaud those who try to bring their bikes up to their own standards, whatever the standards may be.
Throwing money at a Commando will not make it into a modern bike just like Kenny Dreer proved with his adventure.
Kenny Dreers "adventure" was an admirable one in my book. It failed because of lack of funds, simple as that. Not because his bikes failed any kind of modernity test. Again, an admirable attempt on his part. Maybe he should have just stuck with curating a classic bike show?
I hate to sound negative but I think old bikes should be seen with different eyes, the money spent on getting one to your liking is done in the exact same way a chopper rider does to get his bike to his liking. If it's to parade a few miles each year or to just sit and watch it from different angles or ride it like it was meant to be, the result to me is the same, money well spent.
Again,, I would suggest that most - if not all - of us here aren't as naive as you seem to suggest. They bought their "old" machines for valid and varied reasons. They aren't looking at them through rose-colored glasses and seeing a modern super bike. That's a fairly diminutive view of Norton owners in my (not so) humble opinion.
It's unfortunate, but some have more to spend than others so they do things we think are stupid like buying a muffler clamp for $700 or drinking an expensive bottle of wine, port or scotch.
Jean
So some scotch costs more than others? Wine, too? Now that IS crazy! I was actually rather thrilled and excited that the muffler clamps were going for $700, as I have the same set on my bike. Didn't think it was a crime to profess a bit of surprise over it, though. And I think we all reserve the right to express opinions about such matters, just as you (and I) have done here. To me it's part of the fun of old bike ownership. A group of folks with generally similar tastes working on the bikes they love. Their will always be fuddy-duddies and those who build straw houses in hurricane prone areas, but that's part of the fun, too.
I think CNWs new cafe race-inspired Norton is well worth noting, that's why I hav no regrets posting it here. It's part of the interesting mix of enjoying on an older bike. It keeps one thinking, wondering, enjoying all aspects of vintage biking. It's merely a different approach. Maybe not for everyone. But it is fun to talk about and look at and consider and even - gasp! - possibly learn something from.
wrench