christulin said:
I may be the only Luddite on this thread.......
I would not read you post as being from a Luddite at all....this is all very interesting....I was looking at the Power Arc system...and I am a bit cold over it at the moment...so I am planning a different approach...I am buiding a race bike...from scratch after many years away....there are various systems in use.....but from 40 years back the Boyer is still there....alongside a Pazon offering...we used to have, points, Boyer or Luca Rita, I had the Lucas item as an ex works team installation cut away timing cover and all.....it wasn't failure free and I would have like a spare box....but it was delivering better performance than the Boyer, particularly for starting, which since that meant pushing was pretty important.....
Now you can have a range of trick ignitions and yoy can programme it yourself, but i need to get from a new build to a running show and then develop, so my approach is going to be....fit a proven analog system (Boyer or Pazon) and get the thing running to a satisfactory standard. Pretty good chance this will be crank mounted not cam! but I am not rigid o that one yet. Then make sure that whatever else I do I have that set up in the box, and ready to be refitted, even between dyno runs....then get myself a digital programmable unit and experiment, coming back to the baseline to confirm improvements are actually real. Which programmable.....well more research nearer the time, but it is difficult to ignore the Czech system (Ignitech) on price, particularly if I have already gone crank mount.
But having the insurance of a good analogue set up in the box ain't being a Luddite, it is a racer trying to get finishes, in the same way you are a long distance rider making sure he gets home.....good plan....
As for the Power Arc, I think the potential is huge, and I would love to hear if it has been tried on the crank, but it is difficult to choose to invest in a high end optical system (even if I think that shoud in the end be the best solution for a pick up!) if there a questions over the mechanical viability (narrow slots combined with chain float), and the tri-sparking.....
Optical pick ups are proven in 4 cylinder distributors with lower rotation speeds, but from some of the observations here tri-spark seems like it may be potentially be counter productive when accuracy and consistency of spark is your aim....
Hobot, I am not sure I buy into your concern that anything less than a fully programmable system will blow your fancy motor.....and surely by that logic, if you get the program wrong on a programmable system, you are going to get the same reaction! and none of the curves in the box will have been developed for your application.....so why would they be right for you?