Oil leak at the head gasket

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
7,253
Country flag
Head gasket oil leaks.

My Commando has always run a big bore motor, first a 920, then an 880 and now a 924. [an 880 bore with a longer stroke]

The big bore has meant that I have had to run a solid copper head gasket. As most people who have run them for many miles know -they tend to leak oil. Just enough to stain the top of the barrels and give a few spots on the sidecovers and your boots.

I have chased this problem for as long as I have owned the bike. I have tried all the common cures such as dental floss, silk thread and copper wire around the pushrod tubes along with every sealant known to man. Some did help the leak but sooner or later it would always come back.

A few other things I have tried included cutting a groove in the barrel and installing a copper o-ring around the bore. This really helped with compression sealing -but not the oil leak.

I also grooved the head and installed viton o-rings around the pushrod holes. This cured the problem for 5 or 6000 miles but by then the o-ring would be petrified from the heat and the leak would return.

One thing I did notice on the long multiple day rides across the country was if I retorqued the head first thing in the morning I could ride all day with zero leaks. The second or third 5 or 600 mile day, the leaks would return.

So how to keep the head bolts perfectly torqued.

I tried torquing a head to an iron barrel without a head gasket and then putting it in the oven at 450 degrees for a few hours and then letting it cool. The head bolts would always loose torque.

Why? Obviously the head gasket was not compressing, since there was none.

Measuring the bolts showed they had not been stretched beyond yield.

What was obvious was that the bolt holes in the head had gotten smaller and pinched the bolt showing that the tensile strength of the bolt was higher than the compressive strength of the aluminum under the washer.

So then came .100" thick hardened ARP washers. That helped but the head still lost height around the bolt holes and the holes kept getting smaller.
Then I tried the insert type washers from ARP. They kept the holes from getting smaller but the head still lost height around the bolt holes and the head bolts still lost torque.

Then I tried special high strength bolts and immediately noticed the problem became worse.
Wrong direction...

A little over a year ago I tried something new. I put the head bolts in a mill and cut the diameter of the shank down to just under the base diameter of the threads.
I reduced the shank diameter by .062" from just above the threads to just under the head of the bolt. I used a 3/16th radius on the inner corners to eliminate stress risers. Slowly cutting the bolt in the rotating 4th axis using the side of an end mill allowed me to cut mainly in the length-wise direction.

This has turned out to be the answer. The additional stretch available from the undercut bolts has stopped the bolts from coming loose and I have had no leakage now for the past 12,000 miles -without a retorque.

So what I am using now is.

1. a copper o-ring in a groove around the chamber. It really helps prevent combustion leaks into the pushrod tubes.

2. A thin coating of liquid Teflon pipe thread sealant around the push rod tubes and oil return hole. It stays soft and flexible even at 500 degrees where all the other sealants turned to charred powder.

3. .080 thick X 3/4 OD. stainless Belville spring washers under the two front 5/16 nuts.

4. Five undercut head bolts with .100 X 3/4 inch hardened stainless washers.

I am now calling this problem cured. Jim
 
Interesting.
Can we see a pic of these cut down bolts Jim - or are you planning to patent them ?!

Something that older dommie owners routinely do with a similar ? problem - in iron heads - is to remove the studs and then lightly counterbore into the stud holes, and then replace studs.
This stops little hillocks being pulled up around the studs, which can prevent the head and cylinder pulling up flat against each other. Slightly different scenario - but otherwise you can torque them and torque them, and the trace of oil remains.
 
Fantastic Jim ! Wow you really went to great lengths to address this issue. Methodical comes to mind :) Thanks for posting this thread. Gotta love this forum, right guys!
 
Rohan said:
Interesting.
Can we see a pic of these cut down bolts Jim - or are you planning to patent them ?!

Something that older dommie owners routinely do with a similar ? problem - in iron heads - is to remove the studs and then lightly counterbore into the stud holes, and then replace studs.
This stops little hillocks being pulled up around the studs, which can prevent the head and cylinder pulling up flat against each other. Slightly different scenario - but otherwise you can torque them and torque them, and the trace of oil remains.

No patents -they are already commonplace in modern aluminum engines.

I would post a picture but the only two sets I have are installed in the engines. Jim
 
cjandme said:
Fantastic Jim ! Wow you really went to great lengths to address this issue. Methodical comes to mind :) Thanks for posting this thread. Gotta love this forum, right guys!


Well it only took me 35 years and 175,000 miles to figure out something that seems really obvious in hindsight....
 
Onder said:
And you will be offering the Leak-Pruff Head Kit soon?


Maybe, but I would have to come up with either a source of undercut bolts or a better way of undercutting them.

Cutting them like I have been doing in the mill is a pretty slow process....
 
Onder said:
And you will be offering the Leak-Pruff Head Kit soon?
We can certainly hope that he will. I would buy it for sure, that would be money well spent in my book :wink:
 
The thought occurs to me that for those using aluminum cylinders we might have the same issue with the three studs under the head, i.e. compressing the aluminum under the nuts. Do you think it would be worth while to use waisted studs and hardened washers there as well?

Ken
 
lcrken said:
The thought occurs to me that for those using aluminum cylinders we might have the same issue with the three studs under the head, i.e. compressing the aluminum under the nuts. Do you think it would be worth while to use waisted studs and hardened washers there as well?

Ken

I suspect it would help a lot with the oil leak problems that I have seen with them. Jim
 
Not understanding what you have done in the mill, if you waisted the bolts down could you not have turned them in the lathe or have you done something different.
Torque to yield headbolts and good graphite head gaskets might fix a lot of things
 
splatt said:
Not understanding what you have done in the mill, if you waisted the bolts down could you not have turned them in the lathe or have you done something different.
Torque to yield headbolts and good graphite head gaskets might fix a lot of things

It would be pretty much impossible to waist a bolt in a lathe without causing stress risers because the cutting would be done in the wrong direction. Jim
 
comnoz said:
It would be pretty much impossible to waist a bolt in a lathe without causing stress risers because the cutting would be done in the wrong direction. Jim

They could be ground down ?

A pic of the next set you do then ?
 
comnoz said:
The additional stretch available from the undercut bolts has stopped the bolts from coming loose and I have had no leakage now for the past 12,000 miles -without a retorque.
12K and you haven't had the head off yet to measure but I am curious as to the amount of stretch.
It does sound like a pretty logical solution to the issue.
I too would like to see how you milled the bolts.
 
Is the solution based on the fact that the thinning of the bolt shaft makes the bolt more elastic, so it stretches better than a standard bolt, rather than not stretch and crush the casting more?
 
Mark said:
comnoz said:
The additional stretch available from the undercut bolts has stopped the bolts from coming loose and I have had no leakage now for the past 12,000 miles -without a retorque.
12K and you haven't had the head off yet to measure but I am curious as to the amount of stretch.
It does sound like a pretty logical solution to the issue.
I too would like to see how you milled the bolts.

I have actually checked the torque several times by loosening each bolt and torquing it back - they went right back to the same position they were in, which tells me there is very little permanent deformation. I haven't even bothered to check them lately.

You feel a noticeable difference when you torque them. They turn farther between just snug and torqued.

I should add -I am using high tensile bolts and torquing to 32 ft lbs. I have not tried it yet with stock bolts but I think they would probably work just as well.

I will video the next set. jim
 
o0norton0o said:
Is the solution based on the fact that the thinning of the bolt shaft makes the bolt more elastic, so it stretches better than a standard bolt, rather than not stretch and crush the casting more?

Exactly.
 
google torque to yield head bolts (TTY), they have been around for quite a while.
Single use bolts used on aluminum heads, designed to do exactly what comnoz has done.

pretty smart thinking on his part to make his own.
I think that there would be a market for a "no leak" norton fastener kit if someone were to produce them.
 
now that I think about it...... I had a BSA A10 that had turned down head bolts.
pretty sure that they were stock.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top