bill said:I will say it again NEVER PUT A RESTRICTION IN A SUCTION LINE. Looks like another victim of ignorance of basic hydraulic principals as a pump is just that, A PUMP not a vacuum device and WHEN, NOT IF it looses it's prime it will get very expensive.
swooshdave said:mjfriesen said:progress:
I have a little more to clean off, but it is probably about 90% done. So far the journal feels extremely clean, no scoring or scratch, just some discoloring. I had to stop when the 1" foam brush i was using to apply acid disintegrated.
Thanks again Kommando and geo46er!
And yes, Windy - plenty of ignorance here!
You're going to have that bike back on the road before mine! :shock:
JAYMAC said:swooshdave said:You're going to have that bike back on the road before mine! :shock:
I think that is a safe bet!
SteveMinning said:bill said:I will say it again NEVER PUT A RESTRICTION IN A SUCTION LINE. Looks like another victim of ignorance of basic hydraulic principals as a pump is just that, A PUMP not a vacuum device and WHEN, NOT IF it looses it's prime it will get very expensive.
Guess I'll have to show my ignorance Windy. Your comments about vacuum and pumps in a hydraulic circuit have me a little perplexed. My understanding of hydraulic principles is that oil does not compress and does not cavitate. How is it that a pump would lose it's prime with a feed line full of oil?
Jeandr said:Aren't nearly *ALL* cars equipped with pumps living in the engine with the oil underneath in the sump :?: yet there is no dire warning of priming the pumps even after the car has been sitting for months on end without being started. Obviously putting a restriction in the feed line is not a good idea, especially if they are prone to failures, so I'd rather live with wet sumping than a seized engine.
Jean
Jeandr said:Aren't nearly *ALL* cars equipped with pumps living in the engine with the oil underneath in the sump :?: yet there is no dire warning of priming the pumps even after the car has been sitting for months on end without being started. Obviously putting a restriction in the feed line is not a good idea, especially if they are prone to failures, so I'd rather live with wet sumping than a seized engine.
Jean
hobot said:On other lists I've heard tales that the anti-sump valves kept a lot
of famous builders in good business recovering oil starved singles.
hobot
79x100 said:Would that have been Velocettes ? They had an anti-drain fitted at the oil tank union and I have to say that I've never heard of problems from Velo men. It doesn't mean that I like the idea of valves though.
swooshdave said:Diablouph said:If this crank were to be so badly damaged that it could not be reground, is there a way to save it? I'm thinking of something like welding material on the journals. Is this or something else a viable and affordable option?
There was a discussion in that a while ago. You can grind the crank down and use oversize bearings. I think they also spray material (metal) on and then grind. I'm not sure about welding (in the traditional manner).
rvich said:I have been reading this thread in hope my question would get answered without me being the one to swat the hornet's nest. It seems that anti-wetsumping valves is one of those topics that gets people hotter than a wetsumped bike kicker on a hot NC day!
What valve was installed on your bike? And how did you verify that this was the cause of the bearing failure? Has anybody ever burned up a bearing when they didn't have a valve installed? What caused those failures (if they ever occured)? Enquiring minds want to know.
Russ
mjfriesen said:i had the oil pump rebuilt with seals and the timing cover ball and spring mod - did not help. i pulled the timing side apart many times, tried everything i could think of to figure out why it was wet sumping. In stupid desperation i fitted an anti-wetsump valve. And it did cure the wet-sumping. It hasn't wet-sumped in 3+ years as it sits on my workbench!
tpeever said:The oil must be getting by those gears somehow!!