new leakdown results

Status
Not open for further replies.
pressureangle said:
Ah, the leakdown. So many variables.

First I'll assume you are dead certain the cylinders are round, at least at the top where the readings are taken.

I spent a number of years improving leakdown on H-D Sportster 883 racers, which have some significant problems. After the usual cylinder shape issues, simplify your life with a couple simple checks; Spray a bit of WD40 in the cylinders and spin the engine sans spark a couple times. If LD improves significantly, it's the rings.
To the point, there are two critical ring sealing points, neither of which has anything to do with end gap.
First, and most importantly, is the piston ring lands. Any defect here will add +5-10% leak. It's also very difficult to confirm this, and impossible to correct without removing the pistons. Look on the lower land (pressure surface) of both compression rings and note any pimpling, unequal discoloration, scratches or defect. If your side clearance is not on the wide side, use some fine jeweler's rouge to polish the land and ring together. Be very careful about the ring ends while assembling/dessembling the rings.
Second is the cylinder wall surface itself. I've always had best luck in iron bores by using a plateau hone, or as I did being a cheapskate by wrapping a rightly-sized ball hone with 600 grit wet-and-dry sandpaper and honing the bore until you have an equal finish everywhere in the ring travel area. Then, assemble the (very clean) rings pistons and bores with ZERO lubrication except for a light coat of WD40 on the rings and pistons.

Start normally, and by the time the engine oil has splashed the walls, the rings will have made love to everything and you should end up with as good as .75% leak, which was very achievable in the H-Ds.

http://www.enginebuildermag.com/2000/09 ... -finishes/

I agree with everything you have said here.

The cylinders have had a plateau hone when I disassembled the engine and replaced the rings at 9000 miles -using a sunnen soft hone. They look perfect.

I have confirmed the leakage is by the rings. The ring lands are very nice with no wear or damage to speak of.

The fact that the leakage is much greater ATDC then it is BTDC leads me to believe it is due to cylinder shape and the direction of the thrust on the piston.

The cylinder is between .0005 and .0007 out of round due to wear on the front side of the cylinder. I assume this wear is due to piston rocking as any wear caused by the fact that the ring grooves have radial gas ports would be equal wear in all directions.

I have also confirmed that the blowby exiting the crankcases when running on the dyno is considerably higher than my stock MK3 with 25,000 miles by using a crude flowgauge with a floating ball. I have a better flowmeter coming that will give me some numbers to compare. Jim
 
comnoz said:
Here are front and back shots of another pair of high pin pistons ........ These didn't have gas ports but were fitted at .0065 clearance in gray cast liners and raced several times. They show clear evidence of rocking. They wore the cylinder bores on the front side also. [severely]

Front
new leakdown results


Back
new leakdown results


And then here is another high pin piston produced from the same drawing. It does have gas ports. It was fitted in an aluminum barrel with austentic liners at .004 clearance and raced for most of a season. It showed nearly perfect wear. It's mate in the other side of the motor became junk when a Ti valve broke.

new leakdown results


new leakdown results

(OK I get it about the gas jets)

Taking a very crude measurement with a ruler held up to the computer screen, The pistons in the upper photo measure about 60mm tall and 74mm diameter.

The pistons in the lower photo measure about 52mm tall and 81mm diameter.

Proportionally the pistons in the lower photo have much shorter skirts but they show no wear compared to the top pistons which are shot. Because of the Austentic cast iron liners there was less skirt clearance with the shorter skirts. Seems to me the whole issue here is clearance - not skirt length.

The .0065" clearance you set them up with seems excessive. Why so much?

What about wear on the Austentic liners and who did you get them from (contact info)?
 
jseng1 said:
Proportionally the pistons in the lower photo have much shorter skirts but they show no wear compared to the top pistons which are shot. Because of the Austentic cast iron liners there was less skirt clearance with the shorter skirts. Seems to me the whole issue here is clearance - not skirt length.


The .0065" clearance you set them up with seems excessive. Why so much?

What about wear on the Austentic liners and who did you get them from (contact info)?

>>the problem seems to be related to a combination of piston clearance and pin position- not so much skirt length<<

>>I used .0065 clearance because they seized at .0055 clearance<<

>>I didn't have wear problems with the austentic liners<<

>>I got the austentic liners 20 some years ago. I think LA Sleeve got them for me.
At first they said no, and then they called back later and said they found some.
Now they just do nodular iron or gray iron. It seems there are no foundries doing a spun cast austentic iron any more.<<
 
The liners in the Rgm 920 kit were described as "spun cast", however I do not know if they are austenitic or plain grey cast iron, or some other item such as ductile iron.
The liners that came with my 92mm Terry Prince kit (Vincent 1360) are spun cast and austenitic iron. My take is the main dif in the austenitic is the addition of nickel to the process.
I can check with both Terry and Rodney Brown as to where in Oz spun cast austenitic iron liners might be found. Rodney Brown is a foundry man (Esco) who has a long involvement with Norton and Vincent motorcycles.
There seems to be an awful lot of specialty items available in Oz but not available anywhere else in the world, especially for Vintage race bikes.
I did find these spun cast liners for 850s on eBay, no mention of exact material type. Might be worth a query.

http://www.ebay.ca/itm/Norton-Commando- ... 1061177785
 
worntorn said:
The liners in the Rgm 920 kit were described as "spun cast", however I do not know if they are austenitic or plain grey cast iron, or some other item such as ductile iron.
The liners that came with my 92mm Terry Prince kit (Vincent 1360) are spun cast and austenitic iron. My take is the main dif in the austenitic is the addition of nickel to the process.
I can check with both Terry and Rodney Brown as to where in Oz spun cast austenitic iron liners might be found. Rodney Brown is a foundry man (Esco) who has a long involvement with Norton and Vincent motorcycles.
There seems to be an awful lot of specialty items available in Oz but not available anywhere else in the world, especially for Vintage race bikes.
I did find these spun cast liners for 850s on eBay, no mention of exact material type. Might be worth a query.

http://www.ebay.ca/itm/Norton-Commando- ... 1061177785

I would welcome any info you might run into.
As far as I know austentic liners were only for use in aluminum muffs. Jim
 
I would like to point out that the photos above and the results were from pistons that were designed by myself and either JE or Venolia -in the past.

The pistons that are in my engine now were designed around 20 years ago. They gave similar problems when I used them in my roadracer at the time -but since I had them on the shelf I though maybe with easier use, they would survive in my steetbike.

The results you get from similar, more modern designs may be different.

I make it a point to only post results from tests on my own designs and products. Jim
 
Thanks for the honest alert Jim, to shop else where for special pistons : )
Is cylinder or pistons worth keeping now?
 
hobot said:
Thanks for the honest alert Jim, to shop else where for special pistons : )
Is cylinder or pistons worth keeping now?

You don't have to worry about buying any pistons designed by me, I don't have any for sale.

The pistons and cylinders should last until the replacement engine is finished. Then the pistons will go in the bin with the rest of the "not quite ready for primetime" junk.

The barrels will easily go to the next bore size -maybe with Mazda pistons. :D
 
Just teasing Jim in awe of your Norton scope by trial and error priceless expertise. How about evaluating piston cooling oil notching of rods for instance?
 
comnoz said:
I would welcome any info you might run into.
As far as I know austentic liners were only for use in aluminum muffs. Jim

That seems likely. One of the comments I ran into while looking for austenitic liner info was that they were particularly good for use in aluminum cylinders, because their thermal expansion rate was closer to aluminum than was that of the more common grey cast iron liners. That would also mean you could use a much looser fit when assembling the liner to the cylinders. I did a lot of work with 4-stroke Yamaha singles for racing, and typically used ~.004" interference fit for iron liners in aluminum cylinders (95 - 100 mm bores). But I noticed that the TT600, which used an aluminum liner (with nikasil bore coating), had only a push fit between liner and cylinder. Presumably, the liner was always a bit hotter than the cylinder, providing a tight fit in operation.

Ken
 
I am really considering trying aluminum liners in my new billet barrels. Since they are much thicker around the bores I wonder if they would stay round enough for aluminum liners. Jim
 
Hi Jim, I think you had thought about using Nikasil ,but may be due to distorsion you choose not to choose that way ?
 
Posted by ian_sutherland at December 08. 2011

Previously wrote:

Using torque plates makes sense for the cylinder block, especially aluminium alloy as I've learnt from the problems experienced with this block, and torqueing the bolts with a hot engine makes sense too, but wont the damage, i.e distortion due to expansion coeeficients between different materials, have already been done if the initial torque settings are with the engine only warm? You would also have to remove the hot head to gain access to the cylinder through bolts, which in my opinion are the cause of the problem. Also I suspect oil/combustion leaks may be a problem until the engine reaches operating temperature. I'm not a fan of RTV especially were oil ways are present.

Thanks for the advice Ian, what are your experiences with alloy cylinder blocks on Commandos, road or race?, Have you experienced problems with leaks or distortion?

Cheers Simon.

Hi Simon,

Sorry, if I was not very clear or miss-understood, is your block already distorted, if so it's leaking or smoking, and you will have already removed it, and you can probably see the uneven wear pattern.

This has been an ongoing problem with bike engines, especially since more and more parts, started being made of different alloys, looking for more power.

I remember it really becoming a problem with high perf Harley engines in the early 80's, and I think/remember that's where using torque plates really started and/or took off. I certainly cannot remember much discussion on the issue before that. I/we had a dunstall barrel about the same time period and they were quite notorious, for twisting and leaking.

I used the word "warm" because I do not want to be sued, because someone really keen somewhere, scald's themselves with boiling oil.

If you stick a good quality Iron/steel sleeve into aluminium it's going to shift, especially if it has not been thru a few heat cycles. Add in not loaded in the way it is going to be ,and it's going to be more of a problem. A reason why a properly made all aluminium nikasil block with good rings is a much better solution, all be it a bit more expensive. The correct grade of aluminium sleeve must also be used, or the plating departs.

Here is what I am going to do with my own brand new aluminium cylinder for my own latest 850. I am not assuming someone loved it like me.

I am going to take my 850 alloy barrell and make sure that the cases base to cly surface is flat and square to one another and then, that it is to the crank. Now check the head surfaces to one another they are flat and square .

I am now taking my 1 inch thk aluminium torque plates, and I am bolting it all together, using some high temp grease on the presure surfaces, and some light grease or light oil on bolt threads, personally now I use torque lube because I have some. Torque it up as per sequence, if the specs are dry that you use, add 2ft lbs if now lubing. Taking this assembly I stick it in the oven, and then outside to cool, From around 200-220deg F , anymore and you can change heat treat of aluminium parts permanatly. repeat 2-3 times, I use the 3 times lucky rule. Check it hot and when cooled after removing torque plates,for round, If the surfaces are still flat and square, you are ready for honing. Put it all back together, warm it up again, and warm your oil. depends on how you are doing it and with what. I have a lise 4 stone set hone and a bobilie ball hone for finishing, if you are dipping it in fluid that's different to a flowing a source of lube, and you have the boiling point of the fluid to consider to, you don't want more than you have, to have flashing off and killing you softly, We are trying to replicate running conditions, for the final honing, as best we can.

Now your mating surfaces should be still square, and flat, but your bore may seem a little off when cold and not torqued but good when torqued & hot. We are looking for within tolerance, at it's best when simulating conditions. We are never going to truly achieve this because of moving parts and changing pressures, within the cylinders.

I am assumming your barrel is off right now, and if you don't have access to torque plates, bolt it up with the bare head and cases and try it in the oven a couple of times to make sure it is not moving anymore. Remember about the temp limits so as not to damage your parts.

I do not use base gaskets, unless I am shimming for head clearance purposes, shouldn't apply to you, then I use solids for the thickness I want. I Use REAL Rolls Royce, Hylomar blue, they have a new race one now as well, it seems a bit thinner, but stands slightly higher heat, make sure of oilways, it's not like other sealants Thats for the base. On the cylinder head I use solid copper, or other metal types, on high perf. Norton or norvil best quality steel flame ring gaskets are fine on stock engines. I coat them all with copper slip, sparingly it goes a long way. Torque it all down in sequence, now run it ride it a short distance, put some loads thru it. break the nuts, bolts, studs or hex bolts whatever you are using just enough to release the tension in them, in reverse order of torquing sequence and retorque them, I do them hot if I am using copper/metal gaskets, and if I have played with the head in anyway, cold is fine for regular gskt and purposes. done correctly it is not going to get any better. You are starting off from cold with no stress in the motor, cases and cylinder are relativly thin mat'l next to that lump, I don't worry about the internal bolts, it's all aluminium now and when hot, the lower rate bolts should only add a compressive load. If your really worried about that do them up with everything naked and check with a bore gauge. Even warm it up and check. I don't see it.

With your distored barrels, they have moved in accordance with the internal stresses placed upon them, and within them. I cannot tell you what they will do next, only that bolting them up and putting them thru some heat cycles will do that, how many have they already been thru. Then correct them once they have settled. square them to the cases/crank, then head to that. Now warm up the bores and simulate the loaded barrels to the cases, and distortion caused by that giant chunk called a head.

I once shaved 1/2 inch off a set of 500 barrels rewelded the center drilled and tapped it, and used this method to tighten it, it does not have a full face, it's 10.5:1 and it does not leak, and is 750 quick, I've built racers, but not much lately due to gimphood. This is the way I do my bikes and my buddies bikes. I am building my ideal 850 at the moment, all out of bits, I"ve considered removing the steel liner and getting an aluminium one to press in, then sending it off once it's settled, for coating, but at the moment I'm sticking with the steel , to spend my dosh on other parts. It's never going to be perfect somewhere, as your running hot I hope, and gently when cold, I know what I prefer. The bike doesn't know it's racing.

I Hope that gets it, I've pressed in a good few sleeves and they move around untill they settle. I don't know who made yours, but ? are they cast in sleeves like old jap bikes, or cast barrels, then bored and the sleeves pressed in, If so did they leave them in the press for a while after pressing, did they use a pressing oil, have they already cycled them. There are so many different ways you can do things, that affects them for stress relieving , before we go re-stressing them.

The way I look at it, once the only thing made of steel that's stationary, is the sleeve, your problems should be fewer, true different grades of aluminium can expand at different rates, but once you have run it and retorqued it, it shouldn"t move again. You retorque the head to allow the parts to re-align themselves from the running stresses placed upon them. I don't feel that's a concern with the case to barrels joint. If your worrying about bolts putting loads thru the aluminium, I think not, all cylinders would fail and you should be able to trouble shoot it.

What makes you think they are distorting, I recently had a problem with a buddie's BSA, the cylinders were bored out of alignment, with the crank.

Sorry this is a novel, hope it help's

Regards Ian
 
Wow Ian thanks for the living feeling of our pulsing engine parts. Why not try a solid alu cylinder without sleeves like many moderns do? Once the thermal and torque corrections compensated for have surfaces treated and fly with the wind?
 
In the past my experience with aluminum bores in a Norton have not been good. I have always used torque plates top and bottom and sent the torque plates to the people who did the nikasil to use when honing. They always started out round but after a few heat cycles they did not stay round. Serious ring leakage was the result with black stains down the bore where the rings were not touching.

I have only had cast aluminum barrels to do this with in the past. They were considerably thinner where the through bolts were than the billet barrels I made. That is why I may try aluminum sleeves again.

I will not plate the billet barrels directly because the 6061 alloy used is too soft for long life with nikasil. Nikasil needs a hard aluminum base such as A356 casting alloy to last very long. Jim
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top