identify, please

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 28, 2014
Messages
1,855
Country flag
I have a top fork clamp that does not have any provision for handlebar clamps. It does have the fork lock. part # is NM 06-1917. A small 1/4" hole where the handlebar clamps should be. what are these two little holes for?
 
Are you sure it is not a standard 1971 top triple clamp and stem with the handle bar clamp portion removed leaving the two forward holes which are around 0.250" ID at the untapped portion.

Edit add.
06.1917 is the cast in raised number for the above on the under side having a 1971 bike. (Unless that top clamp was modified at the factory for something like a PR model)
 
Last edited:
I have a top fork clamp that does not have any provision for handlebar clamps. It does have the fork lock. part # is NM 06-1917. A small 1/4" hole where the handlebar clamps should be. what are these two little holes for?
Sounds like you're looking at a bottom, not top!
 
I have a top fork clamp that does not have any provision for handlebar clamps. It does have the fork lock. part # is NM 06-1917. A small 1/4" hole where the handlebar clamps should be. what are these two little holes for?
Or, maybe a later Triumph top that used "P" clamps. Email me a picture: marshg@gregmarsh.com
 
Looks like a Nort part, comes up here

"The 71 introduced the new style of top and bottom steering yokes. In any parts book, the only listing is 06-1916 bottom and 06-1915 top for 71, 72 and 73 when the 850 introduced the ANG stamped yokes. According to good friends long associated with Commandos, there was a short production run of yokes that are only suitable to the 71 frame. Something to do with the steering angle. This correct yokes are 06-1916 bottom yoke and 06-1917 for the top yoke. Two friends have authentic 71 750's, one bought new a real one owner bike. Both confirmed the stamping 06-1917 in the underside of the top yoke. With that I found a pair at the local British bike wreckers, dirty and rusty but the right parts for this rebuild."
 
Excellent response in only 35 minutes after posting. So it seems these are 1971 yokes but with NO PROVISION FOR HANDLEBARS. It really seems like these were cast this way. so my guess is that these were designed for clip-ons perhaps for those that wanted a fairing and go racing. I can't think of any other purpose.
 
Excellent response in only 35 minutes after posting. So it seems these are 1971 yokes but with NO PROVISION FOR HANDLEBARS. It really seems like these were cast this way. so my guess is that these were designed for clip-ons perhaps for those that wanted a fairing and go racing. I can't think of any other purpose.
A photo would reveal all
 
It really seems like these were cast this way. so my guess is that these were designed for clip-ons perhaps for those that wanted a fairing and go racing. I can't think of any other purpose.
NM 061917 is the '71-'73 750 yoke casting (normally with the stem). The matching lower yoke casting number is NM 061918.
Clamp lugs having been cut/ground off should leave a smooth surface and two holes.

850 Mk3 yoke but the holes would be in approximately the same place.
identify, please
 
OK..if somebody ground these off they did an excellent job of it. I can't tell even by running my fingers over it. I will set it aside then and look for another one. My bottom clamp is marked ANG and not compatible anyway. Thanks for the info.
 
NM 061917 is the '71-'73 750 yoke casting (normally with the stem). The matching lower yoke casting number is NM 061918.
Confirms NM is out there, didn't come up with a search, but will now
 
Excellent response in only 35 minutes after posting. So it seems these are 1971 yokes but with NO PROVISION FOR HANDLEBARS. It really seems like these were cast this way. so my guess is that these were designed for clip-ons perhaps for those that wanted a fairing and go racing. I can't think of any other purpose.

14 minutes and first reply.
I would have put 1971 and up 750's but regard the 1971 20M3S 750 (FB) as the last 750 Commando and the reason I have one.
 
14 minutes and first reply.
I would have put 1971 and up 750's but regard the 1971 20M3S 750 (FB) as the last 750 Commando and the reason I have one.
“but regard the 1971 20M3S 750 (FB) as the last 750” means you prefer these?
 
Or, maybe a later Triumph top that used "P" clamps. Email me a picture: marshg@gregmarsh.com
Prob wouldn't be a big deal to drill a few holes & go with p-clamps or similar (riser).



solid mount option, no bushing, smallest hole


Amazon product ASIN B08PCNNLS8

Careful with ultra cheap china stuff, I've seen broken ones after install & use.
 
Last edited:
“but regard the 1971 20M3S 750 (FB) as the last 750” means you prefer these?

That was probably a little harsh (I seem too recall you are a long time 1972 Combat spec Roadster owner) and yes I have a 1971 750 Fastback and targeted that model being the last 20M3S drum brake model still with the fastback type bodywork.
Same as I targeted a Mk2a being the last right hand shift 850 that initiated upgrades that went on to the Mk3.
There is a good reason I have only sold a handful of bikes since 1976.

I still can't figure the repeat posts of what was most likely answered. (No photo offered by the OP, the cast in number said it all anyway unless it is some form of PR factory part if those came with a stanchion type clip on)
 
That was probably a little harsh (I seem too recall you are a long time 1972 Combat spec Roadster owner) and yes I have a 1971 750 Fastback and targeted that model being the last 20M3S drum brake model still with the fastback type bodywork.
Same as I targeted a Mk2a being the last right hand shift 850 that initiated upgrades that went on to the Mk3.
There is a good reason I have only sold a handful of bikes since 1976.

I still can't figure the repeat posts of what was most likely answered. (No photo offered by the OP, the cast in number said it all anyway unless it is some form of PR factory part if those came with a stanchion type clip on)
Actually I see a drum front brake fastback on the ‘72 sales brochure. Of course not a 20m3S crankcase. That’s OK if these are the model you prefer. There a few reasons I prefer the ‘72 roadster over earlier 750s. The ‘73 750 is really good, but more like the 850 so might as well have a ‘73 850.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top