slimslowslider
VIP MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2010
- Messages
- 322
WZ507 said:swooshdave said:Not to dismiss Jim's awesome work but for the price of the engine I bet you could buy a new Norton 961. :mrgreen:
Yeah, but then all you'd have is a 961.
+1
WZ507 said:swooshdave said:Not to dismiss Jim's awesome work but for the price of the engine I bet you could buy a new Norton 961. :mrgreen:
Yeah, but then all you'd have is a 961.
WZ507 said:swooshdave said:Not to dismiss Jim's awesome work but for the price of the engine I bet you could buy a new Norton 961. :mrgreen:
Yeah, but then all you'd have is a 961.
comnoz said:Roadrash said:I'm assuming the displacement is 914cc? Those would be very impressive numbers for sure. 76 foot lbs. will get up and go!![]()
Yes, 914 cc from a 91mm stroke and an 80mm bore. Jim
mdt-son said:comnoz said:Roadrash said:I'm assuming the displacement is 914cc? Those would be very impressive numbers for sure. 76 foot lbs. will get up and go!![]()
Yes, 914 cc from a 91mm stroke and an 80mm bore. Jim
Hi Jim,
The std transmission will not keep up with a 50% increase in torque. Are you fitting a TTI gearbox or something else?
-Knut
comnoz said:I am working on something else.
I would use a TTI but first gear is too high for easy use on the street. Jim
swooshdave said:comnoz said:I am working on something else.
I would use a TTI but first gear is too high for easy use on the street. Jim
*arley? That's what Kenny ending up having to use.
johnm said:TT industries will do pretty much what ever first gear you want. Certainly standard Commando 2.54 from memory. I know because I have one.
Bruce seems to be a bit poor at the moment on meeting his times - but he is an honest guy.