These examples appear to be from drag racing with supercharging? He talks about boost. Is that supercharging or turbocharging. I assume those plugs are removed and inspected after each run. So a few seconds under full power plus however long the motor spends starting and on the grid?
The reason I ask this is that my experience with methanol is with road racing over say 20 minutes or so of running as a minimum and my plugs don't look much like these examples when they come out. I do agree with the section on timing on the strap and that often people use too much advance and drown the motor with fuel to try and cool it down. I have definitely seen that.
Interesting but I'd think hard about the cross over from 10 seconds of running in a drag motor to 20 mins plus of running in a road racer. I certainly tuned a lot more toward " to finish first , first you have to finish". Those motors are a lot more on the ragged edge than mine.
I went from petrol to methanol tuning after a few years of reliable running on petrol. I did use Lambda meters to fine tune the petrol fueled bike.
When I went from petrol to methanol I did the volume calculation for the stociometric rate from petrol to methanol and jetted appropriately. 15 to 20 years ago now but I think it is about 2.3 times ????? Don't quote me. Check it if your doing it yourself.
For timing I experimented over the standard 3 to 6 degrees range more advance for methanol to account for slower burn and checked the plugs. Went from 28 degree advance with petrol on a Dommie 500 to 34 degrees on methanol. The new plugs showed the very light pepper spots on the white ceramic that Gordon Jennings says comes from very early pre-ignition causing oil to come past the rings. Backed off to 31.5 degrees. Pepper spots disappeared and the bike ran perfectly thereafter on methanol.
I don't know what the hp increase was but lap times were consistently improved.
Run under New Zealand Classic Racing Register rules between 2000 and 2011