First impressions after rebuild: Back to back comparison

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fast Eddie

VIP MEMBER
Joined
Oct 4, 2013
Messages
21,597
Country flag
Thought I'd start a new thread as this isn't really 'engine build prep' any more, but it is the follow on...
I've now managed to do some miles on the rebuilt Commando, can't be sure how many though, as the speedo has given up.

Here's a brief reminder of what's been done:
Power-train: JS stage 1 cam with lightweight lifters. Beehive valve springs. Lghtened, polished rockers. JS lightweight pistons and longer Carrillo rods. Dynamically balanced crank. Belt drive with Barnet clutch pack. Tri-Spark with Accel coil. 35mm FCR carbs. Various internal components ceramic and / or Teflon coated. Comstock auto cam chain tensioner and sump reed valve breather.
Chassis: Landsdowne fork internals. 6 pot caliper with Brembo m/c. Falcon shocks. New rims & spokes @ 18 rear / 19 front in correct widths for the new Roadriders tires. Norman White cotter pin mod to cradle. Comstock head steady. New AN isolastics. Corbin seat. Loads of stuff from Matt at CNW.

First impressions are:
1. It's SO smooth! Previously it vibrated below 3k but was pretty smooth above that. It vibrated worse when slowing down through 3k. Others seemed to suggest this below 3k vibe was normal. I now know it is not! The bike is now SO smooth everywhere, I am really surprised. As I've done so much at once, it is impossible to know what has impacted what, but the JS internals, dynamic balancing, Comstock head steady and AN iso's have combined brilliantly.
2. The handling is brilliant. It was good before, but it now really does feel like its on rails, well it would, but if it were on rails it wouldn't be able to change line as effortlessly as it does. It feels really light, neutral and accurate. The book said to tighten the vernier iso's and back off 1.5 holes and this will give 5 thou clearance. I decided to guess and as a starting point set them at 1 hole out, therefore approx 3.33 thou, and adjust them until it felt right. But it feels right like this, so I think I'll leave it be.
3. Performance. Obviously I'm not thrashing it yet (having invested so heavily on the internals, I am keen to prolong engine life), so outright performance cannot yet be ascertained. When I chose the cam I was looking to increase power above 3k, even at the expense of a power loss below that. This was because I wanted to keep out of the vibration spot and have strong power up to 7k. The initial, and low end torque is definitely less than before, as expected. The irony is that it now does not vibrate below 3k! So to be very honest, I am now questioning if I should have gone for a cam closer to stock (JS stage 0 for example) however this may change as I explore and enjoy the higher rev regions.

So, in summary, first impressions are great. If before it felt agricultural / Harley ish... it now feels tight and zippy, finely honed, almost modern in some ways. Hard to explain really, but good!

Unfortunately I am grounded at present due to a shoulder injury, but as soon as I am operational again, I'll be torquing down the head again and putting on some more miles. I hope to have it properly de-snagged and bedded in so I can explore the higher rev ranges and get it on the dyno before winter sets in.
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

There's many rebuilds ,and i think yours as got to be one of the best Sounds like you are enjoying the fruits of your labours! But steady running in is needed..bed everything in...and enjoy the late summer. Excellent thread .enjoyed reading it...All the best www.lansdowne-engineering.com
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

Congratulations with a wonderful nice bike and an exciting engine. It is surprising that your engine has so little vibrations. Looks like I have to balance my short stroke once more :shock: .
It will be exciting to read the report on how the power is delivered up the rev range. Please continue to give us reports.
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

Kvinnhering said:
Congratulations with a wonderful nice bike and an exciting engine. It is surprising that your engine has so little vibrations. Looks like I have to balance my short stroke once more :shock: .
It will be exciting to read the report on how the power is delivered up the rev range. Please continue to give us reports.

Jim Schmidt says that the balance factor will be correct simply by fitting his parts. I therefore do not actually change the balance factor, but the flywheel still needed 6 new holes drilling in it to make it dynamically correct. So it seems to me, that whilst it is correct to say that the balance does not need changing, your engine will still only be as smooth as the factory balancing will allow, unless it is dynamically balanced.
Plus, of course, the iso's, head steady choice, valve train weight / spring rates etc, will all add to the 'vibration equation'.
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

Bingo! Head stready choice..may have converted one..join the few brother!

Two hundred years ago Chandier discovered the earth wobbled 30 feet.. a solid connection, engine - frame would only require 10 thou side to side to shake the whole lot..
Approx 20 years ago i worked on a colour grinding works in the potteries, the site engineer was concerned the ball mill was vibrating and cracking the bearing mounts..he foolishly asked me to support the bearing,,i welded a RSJ to a roof support next to the bearing..the whole unit went into a shake!

Guess the 15-20 thou went up the roof support and this vibrated the entire building..show's what power vibes have :!: .

Fast Eddie said:
Kvinnhering said:
Congratulations with a wonderful nice bike and an exciting engine. It is surprising that your engine has so little vibrations. Looks like I have to balance my short stroke once more :shock: .
It will be exciting to read the report on how the power is delivered up the rev range. Please continue to give us reports.

Jim Schmidt says that the balance factor will be correct simply by fitting his parts. I therefore do not actually change the balance factor, but the flywheel still needed 6 new holes drilling in it to make it dynamically correct. So it seems to me, that whilst it is correct to say that the balance does not need changing, your engine will still only be as smooth as the factory balancing will allow, unless it is dynamically balanced.
Plus, of course, the iso's, head steady choice, valve train weight / spring rates etc, will all add to the 'vibration equation'.
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

Hi Eddie,
Nice to hear it's running. Can't wait to hear what it's like when bedded in. The below 3k vibe. plagued my 850 when I first built it 14 years ago. I got Basset Down to balance the crank to the stock figure, & this helped a lot but didn't eliminate it. With the Maney crank & JS rods & pistons it is a lot smoother. I had it balanced to 62%. Please let us know what you think of the Keihins so far ? I'm off to the dyno. with my CR 33mm Smoothbores early next month so fingers crossed.
Martyn.
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

Matchless said:
Hi Eddie,
Nice to hear it's running. Can't wait to hear what it's like when bedded in. The below 3k vibe. plagued my 850 when I first built it 14 years ago. I got Basset Down to balance the crank to the stock figure, & this helped a lot but didn't eliminate it. With the Maney crank & JS rods & pistons it is a lot smoother. I had it balanced to 62%. Please let us know what you think of the Keihins so far ? I'm off to the dyno. with my CR 33mm Smoothbores early next month so fingers crossed.
Martyn.

I had 33mm CRs on a 988cc BSA triple and they were great carbs.

Can you remind us what your spec is Martyn, we can get a book going on what the output might be on the Dyno !?!
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

The motor is:
Maney cases, crank, 920 barrels
JS long rods & pistons
Jim Comstock modified Fullauto head (3mm bigger inlet valves etc)
S&W springs with titanium caps
PW 3 cam set to 0.145" lift at TDC (showing 0.147" on other cylinder)
Trispark ignition currently timed at 28' full adv.
Reed valve breather on rear of crankcase
CR measured at 8.9:1
Presently running 32mm MK 1 Amals with velocity stacks
Stock pipes with original type louvered Peashooters.
I have managed to put a few photos on to Photobucket, but can't figure out how to post them yet. I'm a bit of a computer dinosaur.
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

Matchless said:
The motor is:
Maney cases, crank, 920 barrels
JS long rods & pistons
Jim Comstock modified Fullauto head (3mm bigger inlet valves etc)
S&W springs with titanium caps
PW 3 cam set to 0.145" lift at TDC (showing 0.147" on other cylinder)
Trispark ignition currently timed at 28' full adv.
Reed valve breather on rear of crankcase
CR measured at 8.9:1
Presently running 32mm MK 1 Amals with velocity stacks
Stock pipes with original type louvered Peashooters.
I have managed to put a few photos on to Photobucket, but can't figure out how to post them yet. I'm a bit of a computer dinosaur.

Sounds awesome!

Please go and find a tame ten year old, they'll sort you photo bucket situation out in a tick!

One question, why 33mm CR carbs on such a big and sorted motor? Surely 35mm FCRs would be just the job!?
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

Got my attention on the improved handling ease. 3000 rpm is just for waiting a ways behind cars before seeing it clear to past using the cam as intended. Start snapping WOT to pull into 6000's now. These old things are simply amazing when everything working together on purpose or accidentally.
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

hobot said:
Got my attention on the improved handling ease. 3000 rpm is just for waiting a ways behind cars before seeing it clear to past using the cam as intended. Start snapping WOT to pull into 6000's now. These old things are simply amazing when everything working together on purpose or accidentally.

Yes Steve, I imagine that when I've tasted the 4000-7000 'sweat spot' I'll have forgotten all about life below 3000!

Re handling, I've not done anything fancy, just got good wheel alignment, put correctly sized rims on for the Avon Roadriders, fitted a Comstock head steady, Norman White cotter pinned cradle, new AN iso's with circa 3.3 thou ish clearance, shaved weight from the bike and fitted good suspension front and rear (Landsdone fork internals and Falcon race shocks).

Although it feels very good,I have yet to test high speed handling.

Do bare in mind though that I try to stay on the Tarmac as a rule. I also like to try and maintain both wheels gripping the Tarmac and at the same time. All quite conservative really. I'm not really a sliding, tire shredding, wheelie popping, frame twisting kinda guy!
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

Eddie,

Great to hear your first impressions - It was good to meet up and see it in the flesh a few weeks ago - a really nice, stripped-down 'CNW' style streetbike, and its old 'cast-offs' have got another - albeit more mundane one - close to being re-born too!

Sorry to hear about the injury though :(
As for posting photos, the instructions at the top of the forum should get you there: As our Cousins Across the Pond are keen to remind us 'without photographs it didn't happen!' ;)
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

B+Bogus said:
Eddie,

Great to hear your first impressions - It was good to meet up and see it in the flesh a few weeks ago - a really nice, stripped-down 'CNW' style streetbike, and its old 'cast-offs' have got another - albeit more mundane one - close to being re-born too!

Sorry to hear about the injury though :(
As for posting photos, the instructions at the top of the forum should get you there: As our Cousins Across the Pond are keen to remind us 'without photographs it didn't happen!' ;)

Nice to hear you've made good use of the 'cast off bits' Andy!

I've posted pics in the engine prep thread and the picture thread, but here are some of the finished article for you, just to prove it really has happened...

First impressions after rebuild: Back to back comparison


First impressions after rebuild: Back to back comparison


First impressions after rebuild: Back to back comparison
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

"Do bare in mind though that I try to stay on the Tarmac as a rule. I also like to try and maintain both wheels gripping the Tarmac and at the same time. All quite conservative really. I'm not really a sliding, tire shredding, wheelie popping, frame twisting kinda guy!"

Fast Eddie, so glad you are happy with the JS1 cam , we discussed this, also of note the above quote is only relative to a very rare breed as I notice most on this forum ride or race their bikes often !!!!

Regards Mike
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

Glad you've got it finished and running well - similar colour to my Interstate - Ford Matisse blue. You should be able to make the pre-1990 classic bike track day at Cadwell Friday 26th Sept?
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

Al-otment said:
Glad you've got it finished and running well - similar colour to my Interstate - Ford Matisse blue. You should be able to make the pre-1990 classic bike track day at Cadwell Friday 26th Sept?

Sadly I doubt it Simon although I will try. It is my aim to get track action on it next year though.

I've actually bought two piece clip ons, that can be fitted and removed without having to disturbed the top yoke, and rearsets. My aim is to be able to convert it from Roadster to Racer within 20 minutes or so, two bikes in one!

I know any type of bike can be ridden on the track, but I'm far more comfortable in a racing / cafe racing position when on track. Just personal taste.
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

Fast Eddie said:
1. It's SO smooth!

I've heard of a Commando owner making his own isolastics by pouring in a liquid urathane rubber and letting it harden. All in the interest of better handling. The rubber was firmer than stock. With reduced reciprocating weight and such a smooth motor this might work well.
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

jseng1 said:
Fast Eddie said:
1. It's SO smooth!

I've heard of a Commando owner making his own isolastics by pouring in a liquid urathane rubber and letting it harden. All in the interest of better handling. The rubber was firmer than stock. With reduced reciprocating weight and such a smooth motor this might work well.

Maybe that kind of self development is necessary / helpful at the extreme end of racing Jim. But my lesson learnt here is that the stock isolastics work extremely well, but A) it is important to buy AN items and B) a little experimentation with tighter vernier gaps may help.
 
Re: First impressions after rebuild...

Am upping the revs a bit now... pulls like a scalded cat up to 6000 rpm with great ease and Sounds bloody fabulous !!
 
I went out for a ride today with a mate who has an excellent, unrestored mk3 with about 20k under its belt. It's stock bar peashooters and a double K&N on the new twin Amals.

First thing, it is clear that my Commando vibrated a lot more than his prior to the rebuild. So the 'before and after' comparisons I had were a little 'tainted'. Mine is now much smoother than his below 3k. But above that, there's not much in it, and actually his is slightly smoother at some points than mine (we put this down to the compression).

We did some side by side 'roll on' comparisons, clearly I was very keen to see what all the mods I've done really equated to...

Well, I was wrong in my assessment that mine has lost its low end urge, even at low revs, mine had lots more pull. As the revs rose, the difference just got bigger!

I'm revving mine to 7k now, sometimes more (by accident) and it pulls SO strong. It was most noticeable for me when we swapped bikes and my mate just disappeared, with me riding his stock bike, I had no chance of keeping with him. The performance difference is huge!

The chassis work was noticeable too, with mine just feeling 'tighter' and more neutral and far more 'planted' in the bends.

So all in all, it was good confirmation. My intent was to build something of a hot rod for blasting round on and having fun, and with that in mind, it pretty much seems like 'mission accomplished'!

Final note: Building this bike simply would not have been possible for me without this web site, and all the info I've gleaned from it, and the advice and input I've had from many of you via emails etc. Thanks to all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top