rocker1 said:Hello unclviny
What is it you have issue with,is it any non standard bike.Triton,Tribsa,Trifield,Tricati ect ?
I have a wonderful bike, Its a Norbsa a BSA Gold Star engine in a featherbed frame. See forum "show your other bikes".
Or perhaps the V twin engine grates upon your sensibility's, Over here in the UK at least one commpany puts Harley Davidson engines in replica Featherbed frames.(nice too)And then we have the Norvin.enough said.
We all have our likes and dislikes and I must say this bike is not for me but I can see why he did it and speaking to the owner he said it went well and it does sound nice and reliability would be good.
So my question is, Why not?
Webby03 said:Personally, I would never put a Jap motor in a featherbed, but I can understand why people do it. That Yamaha is probably the closest most of us can get to a Norvin these days, well either that or the Harley engined ones that are built by both Dresda and JW Motorcycles.
Like most specials, they only have to please the builder and owner, I wouldn't build one, but I can appreciate the work and engineering that goe's into building something like that.
Webby
rocker1 said:Suzuki triple,two stroke. Now that is really silly!.
Regards Bobby.
rocker1 said:Suzuki triple,two stroke. Now that is really silly!.
Regards Bobby.
Webby03 said:rocker1 said:Suzuki triple,two stroke. Now that is really silly!.
Regards Bobby.
Philippe, I can see why you might not care for the Featherbed, but what's not to like about the Suzuki motor?prmurat said:Yes silly....a perfect smooth engine turned into a shaker....did I mention I do not really like the Featherbed?
Philippe
....and had some nasty handling traits. My '74 was scary.bpatton said:The Suzuki actually has some advantages over the Kawasaki. Aircooled two strokes loose power when they get hot, and they are noisy. The '75 makes 70hp stock. The problem is that the bike is overweight in the extreme. So...