I have nothing to reference.
The pipes that came with my 73 850 have no balance pipes............. making them probably 750 pipes
Any problem using these presumably 750 pipes on an 850?
You are probably better off with 750 pipes. The 850 pipes with crossovers are known to crack at the welded joint. Most folks that ride 850s have replaced their pipes with 750 pipes.
You are probably better off with 750 pipes. The 850 pipes with crossovers are known to crack at the welded joint. Most folks that ride 850s have replaced their pipes with 750 pipes.
Motorcycle parts and spares for Andover Norton motorbikes: Andover Norton manufactures and supplies all Factory Spare Parts for Norton motorcycles built before 2002.
andover-norton.co.uk
...or short 850 lockrings could be used with additional sealing washers.
I am now onto my 4th 850, having tried most patterns of pipes S & SS as well as 750 non balanced type, I have always found the 850 balanced type smoother i.e. with a non balanced set on the 850 feels harsh.
The bike came as a basket case.
The ex pipes that came with the bike resemble picture #1 (posted by LAB). They are new and measure 1.375" where they meet the muffler.
The ID of the used "Dunstall" muffler where it meets the ex pipe measures 1.56" (depending upon where you measure)
Andover Norton shows no bushing to take up this space
Andover Norton Parts are the only Norton spare parts in the market manufactured to original drawings, within the factory-approved tolerances, from the correct materials, and with the correct finish.
andover-norton.co.uk
Can anybody out in Forum world explain this. Thanks
As a related question, I always have questions, some exhaust pipes run close to the frame others much wider. I prefer the close to frame design. Is this a particular year or aftermarket? Thanks
Someone once told me that correct pre'72 down pipes had the flanges welded or pipes bent at an angle out of the head. So the pipes do not come straight out of the head like triumph pipes. Therefore he said I should keep the originals and have them rechromed. All the repros I have seen are...
"No need for the balance tube. Plus, they suck power as proven on Dyno Hill."
I admit to having a little trouble with this since tests in the early 70's produced the opposite result and a balance tube was recommended for performance work.
I reckon deleting the balance tube is the way forward today, even without the Dyno hill findings. All pipes now are pattern parts and fit is often less than perfect. Adding the balance tube introduces a whole extra level of complexity to the fit. And potentially a whole extra level of failure inducing stresses.
The Access Norton Website uses cookies to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use www.accessnorton.com, you are consenting to our use of cookies.