I solved this conundrum by changing the Showa outer tube to thin wall steel from thick wall aluminium and reducing the inner valves to 19mm. But I could not dial out the hi speed fork travel compression damping being too high, even with the thin wall tube the oil in the outer cavity does not move fast enough to allow the open shims full flow to take effect. So sadly a dead end unless the fork leg tube diameter can be increased.I was told a while back there was no way Showa cartridges could be fit to 47 year old welded construction steel fork sliders.
I solved this conundrum by changing the Showa outer tube to thin wall steel from thick wall aluminium and reducing the inner valves to 19mm. But I could not dial out the hi speed fork travel compression damping being too high, even with the thin wall tube the oil in the outer cavity does not move fast enough to allow the open shims full flow to take effect. So sadly a dead end unless the fork leg tube diameter can be increased.
My last experiment works, racetech goldseal emulator valve clones on rods with one upside down to give rebound damping. X ring on OD running inside the stanchion to force the oil to take the route through the valve, as the valve is static inside the stanchion the X ring cannot wear out on the rough ID.
Trouble locally is potholes and my house being down a 400m rough track so I get to see high fork speed a lot and the digressive damping was not working as it does on my Commando with Showa cartridges with larger internal diameter fork legs. Looking at modern forks and others back into the double damping forks from 65 onwards the common finding is the 200mm2 is the x sectional area needed to remove a restriction so the main device for damping works. So I drill all stanchions with 200mm2 of holes so the oil movement to and from the cavity between the upper and lower bushes. If there are other routes that restrict oil flow other than shim stacks or damping holes then this 200mm2 rule applies.the smooth bore stanchion ID does not seem to be a flow restriction to date.
Trouble locally is potholes and my house being down a 400m rough track so I get to see high fork speed a lot and the digressive damping was not working as it does on my Commando with Showa cartridges with larger internal diameter fork legs. Looking at modern forks and others back into the double damping forks from 65 onwards the common finding is the 200mm2 is the x sectional area needed to remove a restriction so the main device for damping works. So I drill all stanchions with 200mm2 of holes so the oil movement to and from the cavity between the upper and lower bushes. If there are other routes that restrict oil flow other than shim stacks or damping holes then this 200mm2 rule applies.