Well I agree too little end float isn’t desirable either however I am talking about too much end float and I can think of possible problems that could occur with .024” end float like messing up the little timing degree scale or premature wear of the oil pump worn gears and primary chain/belt (out of line).
Because when the end float is less than about .010 on a stock motor or .015 on a high revving race motor you will start to see damage on the ends of the superblend rollers and the thrust surface of the races.
The crank actually gets longer as the revs increase.
I thought given the skipping rope of an centrally unsupported crank analogy it would get shorter as the centre expanded, glad I read this as otherwise I could have used too little end float.
I thought given the skipping rope of an centrally unsupported crank analogy it would get shorter as the centre expanded, glad I read this as otherwise I could have used too little end float.
A friend has an 850 he purchased new in 1973. It was his only vehicle for 12 years so it saw lots of use.
It has 128,000 miles and has never been apart further than head off once for a new gasket.
The end float now is about 55 thou. It still runs fine but is down in power due to blowby etc.
I think people over think about end float and worry to much about it, in 43 years of owning mine and a few rebuilds I never messured the end float I just put it back together, for 38 years it was a everyday ride except for tear downs and injuries was the only time it wasn't ridden and every rebuild new main bearings but the old mains were still good, the crank has only been split once in that time to do the sluge trap but it had very little sluge in it, in fact it had bugger all.
The Access Norton Website uses cookies to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use www.accessnorton.com, you are consenting to our use of cookies.