correct MK3 balance factor

What is the correct balance factor for a MK3? I have the factory manual sppecs but for some reason years ago I marked it as incorrect. I think the two specs for wet and dry were flopped but I want to make sure. I have asked around and no one really wants to commit to a hard and fast number. I am fine with the stock balance factor for everyday riding. What is the DRY factor?

https://www.accessnorton.com/NortonCommando/new-conrods.18713/page-2#post-279196
yes I agree , some Norton manuals are confusing and mixed wet and dry , asI am a bit dislexic, and my memory failed more and more , I have to check every time which way is good (just because now , I need to balance my Nourrish crank with Madass rods for a cdo iso lastic..........!!!), and find the correct bob weight, so should measure it dry or wet ??, for you , I cannot find right now the answer , but Comstock had test an MK3 crank to find a slightly lower BF than announced by factory..........!! so he will chime , may be to help you , on your way .......!

Nothing beats less oscillating mass but best compromises are ancient knowledge ya so catch up to speed below. Can fudge lower rpm isolation, w/o handling issues by beveling rim of nowadays harder new iso cushions. BSA research found best wear/load spikes for 360' twins was 52% dry.

https://www.google.com/search?clien......0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..1.0.0....0.xaD8levSQ2Y

I am not sure what people refer to as wet or dry balance factor.

I would add 100% of the rotating weight plus 52 to 55% of the reciprocating plus 150 grams for the weight of the oil that is not there, split it into two bobweights and balance it. Jim