Compressed Thickness of Andover Norton Composite Head Gasket?

Dan1950

1974 MK II Roadster
VIP MEMBER
Joined
Aug 19, 2021
Messages
1,393
Country flag
Getting to the point where I will soon be able to do a clearance mock-up of my rotating assembly. I'm shooting for .040" quench height between my piston crown and head deck.

Compressed Thickness of Andover Norton Composite Head Gasket?


Rather than stacking up various thicknesses of gaskets, I would like to have the quench pad in the head deepened the necessary amount to achieve the desired quench height. Shouldn't need much more than about .010" removed.

Hoping to use the composite fire ring head gasket to prevent leaks.
 
Last edited:
Last time I removed a composite head gasket on my 750 Norton motor it was .021" smashed down. It did not leak, but I was not running a piston with as much meat on top of it as you are running.

I put a composite fire ring on my almost done and ready to start re-build, but have no intention of taking it off anytime soon to measure it after it is compressed. Damn it I probably just jinxed myself. :)

I'll be firing mine up tomorrow I believe. This one is going to be fun.
 
Last time I removed a composite head gasket on my 750 Norton motor it was .021" smashed down. It did not leak, but I was not running a piston with as much meat on top of it as you are running.

I put a composite fire ring on my almost done and ready to start re-build, but have no intention of taking it off anytime soon to measure it after it is compressed. Damn it I probably just jinxed myself. :)

I'll be firing mine up tomorrow I believe. This one is going to be fun.
I heard that the new gaskets have a thicker compressed height.
 
Last time I removed a composite head gasket on my 750 Norton motor it was .021" smashed down. It did not leak, but I was not running a piston with as much meat on top of it as you are running.

I put a composite fire ring on my almost done and ready to start re-build, but have no intention of taking it off anytime soon to measure it after it is compressed. Damn it I probably just jinxed myself. :)

I'll be firing mine up tomorrow I believe. This one is going to be fun.
With the stock piston compression height, the combustion chamber pressure works on the head gasket seal in a straight line around the perimeter of the combustion chamber. Since the unaltered piston crown of the set-up I hope to utilize will protrude well over .100" above the cylinder/head gasket interface, the pressure force will have to make two 90° turns to interact directly with the head gasket seal.

Might that increase head gasket reliability??
 
Last edited:
With the stock piston compression height, the combustion chamber pressure works on the head gasket seal in a straight line around the perimeter of the combustion chamber. Since the unaltered piston crown of the set-up I hope to utilize will protrude well over .100" above the cylinder/head gasket interface, the pressure force will have to make two 90° turns to interact directly with the head gasket seal.

Might that increase head gasket reliability??
Flame ring gaskets are 100% reliable in my experience... If you ensure scrupulous cleanliness, a little over torque on first assembly, and an anal retentive torquing procedure during the first 6-800 miles.

What static CR are you shooting for?
 
Getting to the point where I will soon be able to do a clearance mock-up of my rotating assembly. I'm shooting for .040" quench height between my piston crown and head deck.

Compressed Thickness of Andover Norton Composite Head Gasket?


Rather than stacking up various thicknesses of gaskets, I would like to have the quench pad in the head deepened the necessary amount to achieve the desired quench height. Shouldn't need much more than about .010" removed.

Hoping to use the composite fire ring head gasket to prevent leaks.
Rather than calculating squish (is that what you mean?) I would do a test assembly with pads of plasticine in the valve pockets and near the edges.
Carefully rotate the crank.
Remove the head and, using a scalpel (or very thin, sharp knife) cut the plasticine and carefully measure how close things came.
I think, with things like this, you can't beat the empirical method.
Cheers
 
My issue with Composite head gaskets is they need to be re-torqued a few times before they're fully settled, which makes it difficult to get an accurate squish clearance.
I still use them, but not on tunes motors.
Never had problems with copper head gaskets myself, and with JS Motorsport offering various thicknesses, it makes life simpler.
 
My issue with Composite head gaskets is they need to be re-torqued a few times before they're fully settled, which makes it difficult to get an accurate squish clearance.
I still use them, but not on tunes motors.
Never had problems with copper head gaskets myself, and with JS Motorsport offering various thicknesses, it makes life simpler.
Agreed about copper - but I would be confident that an old, used composite would work for the purposes of my suggestion in #7 above.
 
I heard that the new gaskets have a thicker compressed height.

The latest composite AN head gaskets are 1.00mm thick. Earlier gaskets were 0.75mm.
 
Last edited:
With the stock piston compression height, the combustion chamber pressure works on the head gasket seal in a straight line around the perimeter of the combustion chamber. Since the unaltered piston crown of the set-up I hope to utilize will protrude well over .100" above the cylinder/head gasket interface, the pressure force will have to make two 90° turns to interact directly with the head gasket seal.

Might that increase head gasket reliability??
The flame ring composite blew out.

I've run the .023" copper, with no failures 32,000 miles.
(Only a SLIGHT oil drool when my front studs won the tug of war in the aluminum threads in the head, and quit clamping properly.)

JMWO
 
Flame ring gaskets are 100% reliable in my experience... If you ensure scrupulous cleanliness, a little over torque on first assembly, and an anal retentive torquing procedure during the first 6-800 miles.

What static CR are you shooting for?
Approximately 10.1:1 static, 7.5:1 dynamic.
 
Rather than calculating squish (is that what you mean?) I would do a test assembly with pads of plasticine in the valve pockets and near the edges.
Carefully rotate the crank.
Remove the head and, using a scalpel (or very thin, sharp knife) cut the plasticine and carefully measure how close things came.
I think, with things like this, you can't beat the empirical method.
Cheers
I plan to do all that, I just want a starting point.
 
The latest composite AN head gaskets are 1.00mm thick. Earlier gaskets were 0.75mm.
The existing head gasket measures .034" compressed.
 
Since the information about compressed composite gasket thickness does not exist on the pages LAB linked to, who has actually removed a newer used gasket recently and measured it?

I was hoping they were a little thinner like they used to be. Boo Hoo
 
Last edited:
A word of caution ref the RGM composite gasket. I recently fitted one, torqued the head correctly. Rode for about 20 miles and when things had cooled decided to check the torque of head fastenings. I wasn't expecting much to change after such a short run but was dismayed to find that all the fastenings were finger tight only! I emailed RGM to ask if they had heard of this before but have not had a reply. Have now replaced it with an AN gasket. Did a quick 10 miles run and everything tight as it should be.
 
The existing head gasket measures .034" compressed.
Since the information about compressed composite gasket thickness does not exist on the pages LAB linked to, who has actually removed a newer used gasket recently and measured it?

I was hoping they were a little thinner like they used to be. Boo Hoo
Since my compressed gasket is only a little over .005" under the 1mm spec of the newer gaskets, I am assuming that it is the newer thicker version. since I doubt that it grew .003" from the .75mm version.
 
Ordered these from JS Motorsport yesterday.

Compressed Thickness of Andover Norton Composite Head Gasket?


Compressed Thickness of Andover Norton Composite Head Gasket?



Andover Norton is dispatching my order today. (Placed the order yesterday evening)

Qty Part No Description Price Each Line Total VAT% Line VAT
1.000 06.0599 KICKSTARTER PINCH BOLT 3.95 3.95 0.00 0.00
6.000 06.0622 RUBBER MOUNTING 2.69 16.14 0.00 0.00
1.000 06.0759 GEARBOX SPROCKET 22T 5/8" x 3/8" 31.92 31.92 0.00 0.00
2.000 06.2412 EXHAUST LOCKRING TAB WASHER 1.95 3.90 0.00 0.00
2.000 06.3988 EXHAUST LOCKRING (CHROME - SHORT) 30.86 61.72 0.00 0.00
2.000 06.3995 SEAL WASHER (06.3253) (NMT2166) 0.80 1.60 0.00 0.00
2.000 06.4118 CRANKSHAFT MAIN BEARING (NM17822/4) 64.95 129.90 0.00 0.00
1.000 06.4285 BEARING SHELL SET (STD) (NM23255) 59.95 59.95 0.00 0.00

GASKET & SEAL KIT (FULL 850cc Mk1/2 COMPOSITE HEAD
GASKET)

1.000 06.5030 39.95 39.95 0.00 0.00
1.000 06.7094 CRANKSHAFT STUD/NUT KIT (750+850) 1972- 1974 36.95 36.95 0.00 0.00
1.000 06.7245 TOOL FOR PRIMARY CHAINCASE INSPECTION CAPS 5.38 5.38 0.00 0.00
1.000 06.7325 INTERMEDIATE SHAFT SUPPORT PLATE TOOL 21.20 21.20 0.00 0.00
4.000 06.7569 CRANKSHAFT SHIM .003" (NMT 2196A) 3.07 12.28 0.00 0.00
1.000 06.7689 CAMSHAFT CHAIN (NM17806) 11.90 11.90 0.00 0.00

IGNITION TIMING PLATE CHECK TOOL (COMMANDO 1969 TO
1974)

1.000 13.1769 7.40 7.40 0.00 0.00
1.000 13.1807 WOODRUFF KEY SET 8.97 8.97 0.00 0.00
DELIVERY DHL - Express WorldWide 53.66 0.00 0.00
 
Last edited:
Back
Top