Hello Everyone
I am also having to replace a failed cam in my MK111 after less than a thousand miles. It was of the 'chilled iron' variety and it had severely worn both inlet lobes. I found the comment about some PW3 cams testing soft interesting as they are made from chilled iron. What is the optimum material/hardness for these cams. All the well known vendors here in the UK say that chilled iron is the dogs bollocks for these cams and i have just ordered another one (a standard one this time, i.e. not a performance cam like the failed one) I hope i have not wasted my money on it.
I have refaced the tappets ( lifters ) by diamond grinding them using a toolpost grinder in my lathe
This shows the lathe setup, the tappets are held in close fitting thin walled tube in the lathes chuck
You can just see the tappet face behind the wheel
The end result, i will be hand fettling to remove the sharp edge on the tappet as i do not want this scraping the lubricant off the cam.
In the local NOC one of the members also has had cam problems with his MK111 and interestingly he now lets his engine wet sump so the cam is slathered in oil as soon as the crank rotates.
I wish there was more space available in the tappet (lifter)tunnel to redesign the tappets to a rotating type like the vast majority of engines. This would need a new barrel casting (bigger/different tappet tunnel arrangement) most likley new crankcases to accommodate
the new barrel design, new cam to provide wider cam spacing, new head design because of the wider pushrod spacing.etc etc A completely new engine in other words
On a slightly different note does anyone know the whereabouts of any Merlin Engineering Double overhead cam 8 valve heads that where made in the late 70,s early 80,s ? I have somewhere a Motor cycle weekly newspaper article picturing the said head fitted to a grasstracking outfit. I think it said it produced upto 90 h.p.
Ride safe
Peter Shand