ntst8
VIP MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2004
- Messages
- 1,763
Spring - in earlier posts there have been comments about the spring being easily overstretched, and that Norton (as they were) reduced the tension on the spring from that originally intended. Is there any knowledge on whether they were just using an under specced spring (for instance mild steel instead of high tensile) or whether there are other design issues at play?
General - I have talked with someone who mostly builds car engines but but who had, a number of years back, worked on a very early 961. He was very anti the split balancer gear in the primary, felt that it was a time bomb which would eventually cause destruction and his recommendation was to do away with the spring and lock up the gear. I don't plan to follow that recommendation, but as these gears seem not to be unusual i am not sure whether just didn't like them in general (i wasn't smart enough to ask at the time), or he had a problem with this particular design and whether the design changed from the initial models . Any thoughts welcomed.
General - I have talked with someone who mostly builds car engines but but who had, a number of years back, worked on a very early 961. He was very anti the split balancer gear in the primary, felt that it was a time bomb which would eventually cause destruction and his recommendation was to do away with the spring and lock up the gear. I don't plan to follow that recommendation, but as these gears seem not to be unusual i am not sure whether just didn't like them in general (i wasn't smart enough to ask at the time), or he had a problem with this particular design and whether the design changed from the initial models . Any thoughts welcomed.