ART or Not .

Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
5,770
Country flag
ART or Not .


Beauty is in the eye :oops: off the beholder . Same must go for a fence , off .
Usual Hysterical twerps whining and inflicting their bigotry on the masses .

If you look at ' beach ' on u tube , Youll get it in the eye far worse .

http://hyperallergic.com/94427/10-of-th ... ld-war-ii/

Bomber Nose Art . https://www.google.com/search?site=&tbm ... cZsOV8FBx0

To a Higher Standard , perhaps .

ART or Not .
 
Folk art, maybe. Art doesn't have to be pretty or even good, it just has to evoke an emotional response. Even disgust.
 
In my opinion, if it evokes disgust, it's not "art". It can be a painting or drawing, but it's not art.
 
grandpaul said:
In my opinion, if it evokes disgust, it's not "art". It can be a painting or drawing, but it's not art.

If the disgust is with the subject and not the representation, it becomes pretty subjective. It's like the junk/ treasure dichotomy, something we all can identify with here.
 
In this morning's newspapers, it shows the figure is now wearing the traditional black Arabic full-length cloak with just an eye slit. The article didn't say whether the original artist had redone it.
 
ART or Not .


Definately less Artistic , to my perception . But is it less stomache churning , Seems ' the librels ' there attack everthing that isnt THEIR form of librilism .

Some demented old crones cant appreciate the ART in a good Triumph, Norton , Street Rod etc etc . " Oh No , THATs Not Art " COBLERS . tho theres an awfull lot of butchered Triumphs about , Wich are POOR Art.
 
Adolph Hitler's art was generated during WW1. It was usually about the strong stag in the verdant forest or similar. At the same time there was an artist who pained a depiction of the trenches. His paintings were about skulls, dead bodies and maggots. People who saw those paintings and had been in the trenches thought they were close to reality. I don't know which is the most disgusting.
 
Back
Top