What is it?

Status
Not open for further replies.

storm42

VIP MEMBER
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
1,220
Country flag
I went to the classic bike show on Saturday and wandered into the auction room where i saw this. Anybody know what it is?

What is it?
What is it?
What is it?
What is it?
 
I saw that somewhere that it is meant to be a "genuine Norton prototype" complete with gearbox fitted back-to-front.
Me?... Naahhh!!
 
I wish they had gone this route rather than spending all their money on the rotary.
I agree. I know PW was not a fan of the engine for race use, but it would have been easy to punch it out to 900cc ish.

A modern 900cc, 8 valve, isolastic mounted twin, in the 1970s… that wudda been awesome !
 
And here is another piece of Nortons history.

 
There appears to be no documentary evidence offered to link this with the Norton factory or Cosworth. Simply anecdotal reference to Bob Joiner and Cyril Chell! and a Liquidation sale.

No one else has ever mentioned such a thing existed.

And indeed, why would an abortion like this be needed?

Cosworth's main contribution will have been the baseline design of the head, piston, cam design from the 3 litre DFV, and that will have been demonstrable by other means. This is proving nothing useful.

Methinks this is scrap metal from another source!

But....for £7K you could not build a decent Commando motor....so I hope someone thinks they got good value!
 
Last edited:
I wish they had gone this route rather than spending all their money on the rotary.
Sort of muddled up statement there. This predates the Rotary considerably. And was the work of, in reality, a different company!

And the Rotary was in fact a much more successful project, leading to very successful race bikes and road bikes that customers bought and survive today.

The fact that neither you nor I would buy a Rotary is irrelevant to the project viability. We weren't the target market.
 
We discussed it on another thread a few weeks ago and the general consensus was that it's a home made bike ( others were not so kind)


It would be great to know the full story though.
 
I wish they had gone this route rather than spending all their money on the rotary.
The rotary was a BSA project NVT inherited when Triumph was merged in. Much development already completed and military contracts for engines meant extra income, so it probably wasn't a loser. But I'm with you on the ill-fated Cosworth project. The Challenge was later shown to be a viable racer, but it never made it to production.
 
This is one of those bikes that makes me want to see all the relevant people from "back in the day" gather around the bike, and nobody leaves until the facts are determined. Then put the bloody thing to bed with rampant speculation EVERY TIME it's re-posted several thousand times...
 
I had always assumed, but have no evidence at all, that the Triumph Phoenix mock up of ‘82 was a revamped Challenge motor.

Does anyone know if this is right or wrong ?
 
I agree. I know PW was not a fan of the engine for race use, but it would have been easy to punch it out to 900cc ish.

A modern 900cc, 8 valve, isolastic mounted twin, in the 1970s… that wudda been awesome !
But would have needed gear driven cams. It was not one of Cosworths finest products.
 
Having seen the Cosworth crank it seems that a lot testing was done as it looks like Swiss cheese.
 
I had always assumed, but have no evidence at all, that the Triumph Phoenix mock up of ‘82 was a revamped Challenge motor.

Does anyone know if this is right or wrong ?
I thought it was developed by Weslake? Need to do some digging...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top