VT750 Nippon Denso CDI ignition on Commando ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
14,549
Country flag
I'm wondering if anyone here has fitted a VT750 Honda Nippon Denso CDI ignition system to a Norton Commando ? A friend is using one on a Ducati and says it is excellent. In particular I'd like to know how the rotor and senders can be set up on the commando engine.
 
acotrel said:
I'm wondering if anyone here has fitted a VT750 Honda Nippon Denso CDI ignition system to a Norton Commando ? A friend is using one on a Ducati and says it is excellent. In particular I'd like to know how the rotor and senders can be set up on the commando engine.

If it is crank mounted it would probably work if you use a 90 degree offset crank ? Probably won't with a 360 degree crank and probbaly won't mount on the cam!

Is there a crank driven ND CDI sytem fitted to a 360 degree parallel twin?

What is on a Kawasaki W650 for example?

There are some aftermarket self generating ignitions around that can be fitted to Norton cranks/cases, PVL based.

I assume you are thinking of your Seeley race bike application.
 
Yes it is for the race bike. As I understand it the CDI is not powered from a crank mounted generator, but by battery. All that is needed is a modified rotor and senders to fire it. Apparently the Nippon Denso advance curve works well with the Ducati motor. The price of the black box is about $80, and there are lots on Ebay. To me it looks like it would be worthwhile mounting it on the bike, and having a look at it on a CRO. If anyone has ever been there, they might be able to give me some idea of the result I might expect ?
 
Why don't you ask the Duc owner ?
Ducatis have rather different v-angle to Ondas VT750,
so it would have to have been rather modified to work for him.

VT are rather pedestrian performance though - twist the throttle yawn and wait for something to happen.
What do you have at present ?

For race use, you barely need an advance curve ?
All the rev scale used is at full advance... ??
 
Rohan said:
Why don't you ask the Duc owner ?
Ducatis have rather different v-angle to Ondas VT750,
so it would have to have been rather modified to work for him.

VT are rather pedestrian performance though - twist the throttle yawn and wait for something to happen.
What do you have at present ?

For race use, you barely need an advance curve ?
All the rev scale used is at full advance... ??

My bevel has a Bosch ignition which apparently is a bit clunky advance wise. Its really two separate ignition systems on a common crank for the reasons you point out.
If I was to replace it I'd go Ignitech as its the preferred programmable ignition for both bevel and rubber band ones. :D
My BMW uses one and its much the same as a brit bike with both pistons going up and down at the same time.
As for advance I'd tend to agree as I haven't really bothered setting it up other than full advance at 28 degrees.
I'd not bother wasting time with a used Honda one either :mrgreen:
I gather the original Japanese ignition fitted to Belt Drives is not up to much anyway.
 
'For race use, you barely need an advance curve ?
All the rev scale used is at full advance... ?? '

What do you base that comment on, and why do modern race bikes have optional advance curves (or do they ?) I've always used fixed advance, however that doesn't mean it is the best option. I notice with the MotoGP Workshop material, there are many things which are NOT discussed. The slightest increase in urge and flexibility around the twisty stuff on race circuits is worth having, and if the bike gets out of corners quicker, the top speed down the straights is higher. The other area I need to investigate further is the taper on the needles. I think there might be a bit more gain to be had there. At the moment the bike is very quick, however as you well know - with methanol even rich it will always be quick, it's just that jetted to the optimum it is usually quicker again.
 
It was the Duke owner who suggested the Nippon Denso ignition system and it is something I thought briefly about a year ago. He remanufactured the rotor to fit it. It is a matter of positioning the pick-ups. I haven't seen the installation on his bike, so dimensions and accommodating the rotor is still an unknown to me. His comment was that the Nippon Denso unit has been well-developed over a long time and is excellent. I still don't know the theory behind the shape of the advance curve. I think the trial and error approach would be futile with this change, unless there is a well defined starting point. There are too many variables.
 
I know nothing about Moto GP bikes but I'd be guessing they rev to more than 7500 with an advance curve that might go higher too.
They would probably also have TPS, I looked at one for my Dellortos but more of a butterfly shaft thing really.
I like the Ignitech as you can plug a laptop in a set up the curve to whatever you like, and the rev limiter. If I had a TPS, clutch or gearshift cut out could do that too.
Google Ducati ignitech, lots there.
 
72Combat said:
I know nothing about Moto GP bikes but I'd be guessing they rev to more than 7500 with an advance curve that might go higher too.

They also have an extremely well developed fuel injection system,
and an even more developed traction control system,
to cope with hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of horsepowers....
So the advance function would be an integral part of that.

Essential for not getting spat off every time you even THOUGHT of opening the throttle.
Suzook and Kwikasaki didn't quit MotoGP because their bikes were well sorted out in that dept.
Onda is rumoured to have headhunted someone in Yamahahaha to advance their multi million $$$ racebikes.

Rather different to a Commando ??
 
'For race use, you barely need an advance curve ?
All the rev scale used is at full advance... ?? '

acotrel said:
What do you base that comment on, .

A stock Commando ignition system is fully advanced by 3000 rpm.
Do race bikes ever even go that low in the rpm register ???

Its not like they have highly sophisticated ignition or carburation systems,
or traction control systems.
No offence to stock Commandos here, of course, just stating basic factoids...
 
Jim Comstock - this seems to fit in with what you told me about your ignition system retarding at high revs. THANKS for that.
VT750 Nippon Denso CDI ignition on Commando ?
 
Alan the Harley ignition is not a hi rpm related issue but for a lugging loaded down hi throttle low vacuum Anti-detonation feature that is not related to the reason comnoz and others use retard near top rpms, Which is to get more combustion pressure as volumetric efficiency increases [on cam/pipes] upping compression charge density when flame fronts can travel faster so need less lead time to give most pressure just after TDC.
 
hobot said:
Alan the Harley ignition is not a hi rpm related issue but for a lugging loaded down hi throttle low vacuum Anti-detonation feature that is not related to the reason comnoz and others use retard near top rpms, Which is to get more combustion pressure as volumetric efficiency increases [on cam/pipes] upping compression charge density when flame fronts can travel faster so need less lead time to give most pressure just after TDC.
Steve, if you read about the programming of the Harley ignition, the curves relate to a rev range up to about 6,000 RPM then the advance is held constant to 8000 rpm unless the pressure switch operates if the manifold vacuum is too low, and detonation might occur , - then the second less advanced curve comes into operation. To me those are the ranges the commando operates within. What it means is that the static advance can be increased without the danger of detonation because the timing will retard if you open the throttle wide and lose vacuum. I use methanol fuel which is said to have unlimited antiknock we also use it in both H1 and H2 Kawasaki triple two strokes which run extremely lean to get best power. My brother had a lead pop out of a coil, and just plugged it back in. This upset one of the boxes in the Lectrix ignition system , and there was a detonation which cracked a cylinder head.
In the end, there is a balance which must be maintained between comp. ratio, mixture, and ignition advance to maintain a certain condition in the combustion chamber. As the revs rise the timing should advance to allow time for the optimum combustion event to take place. If it has done that and you open the throttle wide and lose vacuum, the mixture becomes even leaner. Under normal circumstances, a fixed ignition timing means the amount of advance you can use is very limited. So more energy goes out the exhaust pipe (you don't capture the whole event even with the best designed cam ).
With petrol the situation is even worse, it actually is more prone to detonation and high combustion temperatures, and that is what limits the amount of advance you can use.
With the late 70s 350cc two strokes, power valves and power jets are used to try and stop detonation, particularly with some expansion chamber configurations. If a two stroke bike is not jetted lean enough, it will usually be very slow and sometimes not even run. I know that racing TZ350 Yamahas run much less static advance than RD350s and you always have to feed the throttle.
With my 850 commando, I add 4 degrees advance to the static timing over that used for petrol when using methanol, and I'm not that particular about the main jet size. The mid throttle jetting is extremely lean. I only use the bike on a short circuit with mainly twisty bits and only two fairly long straights. If I wanted to take it to Phillip Island, I'd have to make it go slower or it would do damage to itself. Your Daytona would be horrendous if you had the bike set up well for a short circuit. Gearing is another factor - if the bike is set up to pull a higher overall gearing due to the cams and exhaust you are using and the limitations of the crankshaft, the frequency of throttle wide open in high revs situations is increased. The six speed CR box should help.
 
Alan, I am paying close attention to your methanol experience as it may be only way to press Peel to the limits I want to and not melt into burning aluminum. Still you ain't quite got the reasoning right on the function of the Harley vacuum activated curve. There is an anti-detonation reason and a more power reason but they certainly do over lap directly with what you are discussing on a/f mixture, which Peel avoids over rich power bog by watering the flames of gasoline. My P!! was set so hi initial advance it'd always fire on the kick down so took serious full body focused into a karate Kick down or would injure me &or tossed off. It went to 9000 rpm once in a while on contact breakers and eager to do more and somewhat did when shift missed or tire turned floated on burning rubber vapor pressure. So mystified on how that was attained back in '68 yet so hard today. We've a couple others claiming similar red line so hope they'll reveal the secrets with 40+ yr old technology.

Octane influences speed of flame fronts on top of increasing compression density too, if too advanced near top end piston works against too much combustion pressure and heat loads spike inside. Oh Yeah don't forget to try cooler plugs to get away with less Harley type retard needs to avoid detonation with less lost of power curve.


I've known Super Stock racers that have tried this, but never personally done it. Thier cars always ran the class index times, so it must have worked for them.
They were running 40 degrees in 1st and 2nd gear then had a retard switch on the shifter so when you went into high gear it would retard the engine to 36 degrees. Never seen it on a dyno but there are some big name people that run timing timers on some serious cars.
J Jackson
JN Motorsports
http://www.OldGuysGoingFast.com


A Mercedes V8 engine was able to run 38 degrees at high rpm, peak load without audible detonation. However, best results came from a full load advance of 28 degrees.
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/article.html?&A=109132
 
Steve, I don't believe colder plugs stop detonation. They simply allow the combustion temperatures to be higher. When you read them, you need to remember that it takes higher combustion temperatures to make the indicator ring on the porcelain disappear. The detonation problem is not changed by that except that it is more likely to happen, because you lean off the main jets more to get the correct plug reading. When you adjust the main jets in your bike always use the warmer plugs, then fit the cold ones for racing. The cold ones foul more easily, however stand up better under extreme conditions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top