Which one would normally conclude 2 things from:
1. A poor design that is difficult to manufacture ‘right first time’.
2. Manufacturing processes that are not in control.
Which one would normally conclude 2 things from:
1. A poor design that is difficult to manufacture ‘right first time’.
2. Manufacturing processes that are not in control.
Really that shouldn’t impact variability of finished product quality.
What it should impact is ability to produce due to either lack of parts, or poor quality parts being rejected.
So in a ‘good’ company, poor quality parts wouldn’t make it to the final stage.
So, if poor quality parts were the cause of poor Dyno numbers, that actually tells us that Norton did not have a good / functioning Quality Management System.
Which therefore means you are probably quite right !
The Access Norton Website uses cookies to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use www.accessnorton.com, you are consenting to our use of cookies.